Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 477552 - sci-electronics/gdhl-0.29: fails to work with >=glibc-2.16
Summary: sci-electronics/gdhl-0.29: fails to work with >=glibc-2.16
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: The Soldering-Iron Brotherhood
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-07-21 05:21 UTC by Alexander Vershilov (RETIRED)
Modified: 2013-08-04 09:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Patch that fixes situation (ghdl-0.29-gcc.patch,4.40 KB, patch)
2013-07-21 05:22 UTC, Alexander Vershilov (RETIRED)
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alexander Vershilov (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-07-21 05:21:21 UTC
sci-electronics contains bundled gnat-gcc, that require patching against glibc-2.16.

../../.././libgcc/../gcc/config/i386/linux-unwind.h: In function ‘x86_fallback_frame_state’:
../../.././libgcc/../gcc/config/i386/linux-unwind.h:142: error: field ‘info’ has incomplete type


That error was reported over gnat-gcc ebuild, but I have to apply similar patches here. So if there is a purpose for having bundleded gnat-gcc, than why ghdl depend on a system gnat-gcc?
Comment 1 Alexander Vershilov (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-07-21 05:22:40 UTC
Created attachment 353754 [details, diff]
Patch that fixes situation

Patch similar to gnat-gcc patch
Comment 2 Thomas Beierlein gentoo-dev 2013-07-21 18:32:06 UTC
There is no gnat-gcc in the package, but a normal gcc used as backend to produce binary code from VHDL. 

But it needs a similar gcc-version as gnat-gcc, so the patches are the same.
Comment 3 Thomas Beierlein gentoo-dev 2013-08-04 09:11:16 UTC
Fixed.

+  04 Aug 2013; Thomas Beierlein <tomjbe@gentoo.org> ghdl-0.29.ebuild,
+  +files/ghdl-0.29-gcc.patch:
+  Fix bug #477552, use <texinfo-5.1. Thanks qnikst for providing the patch
+