Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 42784 - when emerging samba rpctorture does not correctly build
Summary: when emerging samba rpctorture does not correctly build
Status: VERIFIED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: AMD64 Linux
: High normal
Assignee: Donny Davies (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 66032 95932 96342 101121 116644 129619 141505 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-02-24 11:38 UTC by postmodern
Modified: 2006-07-23 11:30 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description postmodern 2004-02-24 11:38:30 UTC
When emerging the samba package the sub program rpctorture does not correctly build. This does not crash the emerge but just omites the program from the emerge.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge samba
2. watch for error message marked with yellow *

Actual Results:  
the error message...
---
torture/rpctorture.c: In function `main':
torture/rpctorture.c:233: error: storage size of `cli_info' isn't known
torture/rpctorture.c:373: error: `scope' undeclared (first use in this function)
torture/rpctorture.c:373: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
torture/rpctorture.c:373: error: for each function it appears in.)
torture/rpctorture.c:531: warning: passing arg 5 of `create_procs' from
incompatible pointer type
torture/rpctorture.c:535: warning: passing arg 5 of `create_procs' from
incompatible pointer type
make: *** [torture/rpctorture.o] Error 1
 * rpctorture didnt build
---
is printed.

Expected Results:  
properly build rpctorture and not print the error message.
Comment 1 Donny Davies (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-02-25 05:54:44 UTC
Yeah, I know.  I wrote the ebuild.

I used yellow because it is not very important.

Why are you reporting this as a bug on bugs.gentoo.org?

This is not our bug.

Bye.
Comment 2 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2004-02-26 17:52:26 UTC
what he's trying to say is please bug the samba team about the program not compiling correctly ... it's been like this for some time
Comment 3 Sven Wegener gentoo-dev 2004-10-01 08:47:18 UTC
*** Bug 66032 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Barry Salter 2004-12-16 01:30:13 UTC
Now reported to the Samba team via their Bugzilla. Their ref #2163.
Comment 5 Barry Salter 2004-12-16 17:01:31 UTC
Just for completeness, the response received from Volker Lendecke (one of the Samba team) was:

-----BEGIN QUOTE-----

rpctorture is not supported in any way. If you need similar functionality look
at samba4 smbtorture.

-----END QUOTE-----
Comment 6 postmodern 2004-12-16 19:27:38 UTC
Well good ridens to that buggy code.
Comment 7 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-13 01:34:59 UTC
*** Bug 95932 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-17 00:25:40 UTC
*** Bug 96342 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-02 16:54:10 UTC
*** Bug 101121 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Henti Smith 2005-09-14 03:44:20 UTC
Any chance we can disable compiling of this then since I need to patch samba for
some things and cannot ebuild compile since it stops there ? 

Thanks :) 
Comment 11 Henti Smith 2005-09-14 03:46:00 UTC
Nevermind.. seems the compile is actually done and I can install and qmerge
afterwards :) 
Comment 12 postmodern 2005-09-14 10:45:08 UTC
net-fs/samba-3.0.14a-r2 still has a broken rpctorture and does not build or
install the rpctorture util.
Comment 13 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-24 13:49:27 UTC
*** Bug 116644 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 14 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-11 11:34:32 UTC
*** Bug 129619 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-23 09:17:11 UTC
*** Bug 141505 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***