Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 355433 - media-libs/libsndfile-1.0.23 doesn't emerge with FEATURES="parallel-fetch"
Summary: media-libs/libsndfile-1.0.23 doesn't emerge with FEATURES="parallel-fetch"
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Library (show other bugs)
Hardware: AMD64 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Sound Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 355429 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-02-18 13:19 UTC by Kolan Sh.
Modified: 2011-02-20 10:09 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
emerge --info libsndfile (emerge.info,4.70 KB, text/plain)
2011-02-18 13:21 UTC, Kolan Sh.
Details
build log (build.log,28.29 KB, text/plain)
2011-02-18 13:22 UTC, Kolan Sh.
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kolan Sh. 2011-02-18 13:19:52 UTC
Package media-libs/libsndfile different versions is emerging with
FEATURES="parallel-fetch" with infinite output:
libtool: compile: Waiting for - shave-mode = compile.o.lock to be removed

While other packages, such as media-sound/mpd, virtual/pager successfully emerge with FEATURES="parallel-fetch".

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. change in /etc/make.conf variable FEATURES="parallel-fetch"
2. emerge -1 media-libs/libsndflie
Actual Results:  
infinite output of a message
libtool: compile: Waiting for - shave-mode = compile.o.lock to be removed

Expected Results:  
build success...
Comment 1 Kolan Sh. 2011-02-18 13:21:16 UTC
Created attachment 262909 [details]
emerge --info libsndfile
Comment 2 Kolan Sh. 2011-02-18 13:22:36 UTC
Created attachment 262911 [details]
build log
Comment 3 Kolan Sh. 2011-02-18 13:24:05 UTC
*** Bug 355429 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Tim Harder gentoo-dev 2011-02-20 09:39:34 UTC
This looks like a distcc problem. For example, see bug #334105.
Comment 5 Kolan Sh. 2011-02-20 10:02:13 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> This looks like a distcc problem. For example, see bug #334105.
> 
It is strange. As I have written in one of duplicate bug, turned off distcc, having left one only parallel-fetch and the result was the same.
But now I have again repeated this operation and build has passed successfully.
Having included repeatedly distcc the result with an error has been received.

Means, really, a problem in distcc. Thanks Big!
Comment 6 Kolan Sh. 2011-02-20 10:09:19 UTC
I have set this bug as INVALID, or it is necessary to assign it to the team that oversees distcc?
I don't know, how is correct.