Wrt http://sources.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=devmanual.git;a=commitdiff;h=8095994ddde25a75e99fd34dff81cf8522cd0ce4 should I fix www-apps/bugzilla?
i dont think that blanket statement is a good idea. binding to common USE flags for runtime dependencies does a lot more good than harm for users. sounds like this needs to be discussed on gentoo-dev first.
I don't think that is a good idea. That is meant for packages that install binaries, not interpreted scripts.
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=f2fa70ce5190a8073fd697326a8495f2626326f2 commit f2fa70ce5190a8073fd697326a8495f2626326f2 Author: David Denoncin <ddenoncin@gmail.com> AuthorDate: 2020-07-18 15:58:44 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-08-01 20:27:37 +0000 www-apps/bugzilla: vbump 5.0.6 This new ebuild leaves dealing with mod_perl to experienced users. This change enables bumping the ebuild to EAPI 7. It also loses using use flags for optional runtime dependencies. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/712706 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/332251 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.99, Repoman-2.3.22 Signed-off-by: David Denoncin <ddenoncin@gmail.com> Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/16125 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> www-apps/bugzilla/Manifest | 1 + www-apps/bugzilla/bugzilla-5.0.6.ebuild | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++ .../bugzilla/files/bugzilla-5.0.6-leftbrace.patch | 17 +++ www-apps/bugzilla/files/bugzilla-5.0.6-perl.patch | 17 +++ .../bugzilla/files/bugzilla-5.0.6-template.patch | 17 +++ www-apps/bugzilla/files/postinstall-5.0.6-en.txt | 30 ++++++ www-apps/bugzilla/files/postinstall-en.txt | 1 + www-apps/bugzilla/files/postupgrade-5.0.6-en.txt | 10 ++ 8 files changed, 211 insertions(+)