>>> Starting src_prepare * Fixing OMF Makefiles ... [ ok ] * Running elibtoolize in: libsoup-2.29.91 * Applying portage-2.2.patch ... * Applying sed-1.5.6.patch ... * Applying as-needed-2.2.6.patch ... * Applying libsoup-fix-build-without-gnome-with-doc.patch ... * Failed Patch: libsoup-fix-build-without-gnome-with-doc.patch ! * ( /usr/portage/local/gnome/net-libs/libsoup/files/libsoup-fix-build-without-gnome-with-doc.patch ) * * Include in your bugreport the contents of: * * /var/tmp/paludis/net-libs-libsoup-2.29.91/temp//libsoup-fix-build-without-gnome-with-doc.patch.out ***** libsoup-fix-build-without-gnome-with-doc.patch ***** ========================================================== PATCH COMMAND: patch -p0 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < '/usr/portage/local/gnome/net-libs/libsoup/files/libsoup-fix-build-without-gnome-with-doc.patch' ========================================================== patching file docs/reference/Makefile.am Hunk #1 FAILED at 13. Hunk #2 succeeded at 38 with fuzz 1. Hunk #3 succeeded at 65 (offset 1 line). 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file docs/reference/Makefile.am.rej patching file docs/reference/libsoup-2.4-docs.sgml Hunk #1 succeeded at 52 (offset 5 lines). ========================================================== PATCH COMMAND: patch -p1 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < '/usr/portage/local/gnome/net-libs/libsoup/files/libsoup-fix-build-without-gnome-with-doc.patch' ========================================================== can't find file to patch at input line 9 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Fix Gentoo Bug 268592, patch adapted from upstream patch. | |Modified to apply to a release tarball (no libsoup-2.4-docs.sgml.in) |Hence, to be applied ONLY when !gnome && doc | |--- |--- docs/reference/Makefile.am |+++ docs/reference/Makefile.am -------------------------- No file to patch. Skipping patch. 3 out of 3 hunks ignored can't find file to patch at input line 39 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- docs/reference/libsoup-2.4-docs.sgml |+++ docs/reference/libsoup-2.4-docs.sgml -------------------------- No file to patch. Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored ========================================================== PATCH COMMAND: patch -p2 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < '/usr/portage/local/gnome/net-libs/libsoup/files/libsoup-fix-build-without-gnome-with-doc.patch' ========================================================== patching file Makefile.am Hunk #1 FAILED at 13. Hunk #2 FAILED at 38. Hunk #3 FAILED at 61. 3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.am.rej can't find file to patch at input line 39 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- docs/reference/libsoup-2.4-docs.sgml |+++ docs/reference/libsoup-2.4-docs.sgml -------------------------- No file to patch. Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored ========================================================== PATCH COMMAND: patch -p3 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < '/usr/portage/local/gnome/net-libs/libsoup/files/libsoup-fix-build-without-gnome-with-doc.patch' ========================================================== can't find file to patch at input line 9 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Fix Gentoo Bug 268592, patch adapted from upstream patch. | |Modified to apply to a release tarball (no libsoup-2.4-docs.sgml.in) |Hence, to be applied ONLY when !gnome && doc | |--- |--- docs/reference/Makefile.am |+++ docs/reference/Makefile.am -------------------------- No file to patch. Skipping patch. 3 out of 3 hunks ignored can't find file to patch at input line 39 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- docs/reference/libsoup-2.4-docs.sgml |+++ docs/reference/libsoup-2.4-docs.sgml -------------------------- No file to patch. Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored ========================================================== PATCH COMMAND: patch -p4 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < '/usr/portage/local/gnome/net-libs/libsoup/files/libsoup-fix-build-without-gnome-with-doc.patch' ========================================================== can't find file to patch at input line 9 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Fix Gentoo Bug 268592, patch adapted from upstream patch. | |Modified to apply to a release tarball (no libsoup-2.4-docs.sgml.in) |Hence, to be applied ONLY when !gnome && doc | |--- |--- docs/reference/Makefile.am |+++ docs/reference/Makefile.am -------------------------- No file to patch. Skipping patch. 3 out of 3 hunks ignored can't find file to patch at input line 39 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- docs/reference/libsoup-2.4-docs.sgml |+++ docs/reference/libsoup-2.4-docs.sgml -------------------------- No file to patch. Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored
a real summary line would have been nice.
Created attachment 221079 [details] libsoup-fix-build-without-gnome-with-doc.patch.out
Created attachment 221085 [details] build.log
Created attachment 221087 [details] emerge_info.txt
Ugh, I'll try to look into it tomorrow.
Should be fixed in overlay by now, so please close the bug if it works.
(In reply to comment #6) > Should be fixed in overlay by now, so please close the bug if it works. > Yep that fixed it.
