I search in sources libhal.h it not exist and remove hal and revdep-rebuild not found break files Reproducible: Always
That's why it's a runtime depend, not a build-time depend, it's used to detect the drive, same as in k3b...
udev detect changes too I remove sys/hal from my gentoo and brasero run OK
Actually, it seems devicekit-disks/gio is used for this since some time. [1] Reporter is correct. [1] http://git.gnome.org/browse/brasero/commit/?id=02d31a74b6d92d1fa8548775e8792a4f23efd9e2
Indeed. The sync of dependency fixes from gnome overlay fixed this problem. Thanks for reporting.
(In reply to comment #4) > Indeed. The sync of dependency fixes from gnome overlay fixed this problem. > Thanks for reporting. > The sync introduced the gvfs depend back, looks bogus
The commit also introduced gtk-doc under doc? ( ) and is missing it from IUSE... Reopening before of that, and the bogus gvfs depend.
Created attachment 215102 [details, diff] Fix deps No need to rebuild already built documentation.
> The commit also introduced gtk-doc under doc? ( ) and is missing it from > IUSE... Reopening before of that, and the bogus gvfs depend. thanks for spotting this. About gvfs, it is needed for mounting/unmounting & co. It's just a runtime dep.
(In reply to comment #7) > No need to rebuild already built documentation. > we do this for consistence, real fix will come with bug #262491.
(In reply to comment #8) > > The commit also introduced gtk-doc under doc? ( ) and is missing it from > > IUSE... Reopening before of that, and the bogus gvfs depend. > > thanks for spotting this. There's no --enable/--disable $(use_enable ) to control the USE doc, so it's still wrong. > > About gvfs, it is needed for mounting/unmounting & co. It's just a runtime dep. > I'm pretty sure I checked the sources and couldn't find anything related to gvfs there... Except commented out code.
(In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #8) > > > The commit also introduced gtk-doc under doc? ( ) and is missing it from > > > IUSE... Reopening before of that, and the bogus gvfs depend. > > > > thanks for spotting this. > > There's no --enable/--disable $(use_enable ) to control the USE doc, so it's > still wrong. Oops, I forgot that gnome2.eclass does that. Still, the ebuild should have it's own, eclass is no place for it.
