Hi guys, app-benchmarks/bashmark has been quite neglected for some time. Now the homepage is gone, I haven't found any download location. Please discuss killing this zombie package :)
Patrick, I thought you were the new app-benchmarks guy? %% epkginfo app-benchmarks/bashmark Package: app-benchmarks/bashmark Herd: benchmarks Maintainer: genstef@gentoo.org Location: /usr/portage/app-benchmarks/bashmark Keywords: bashmark-0.6.2: amd64 x86 23:41 <@darkside_> !herd benchmarks 23:42 <+Willikins> darkside_: (benchmarks) patrick Anyway, you know better than us. We will say, if it compiles and works..leave it. However, not much good without an upstream I am afraid.
Works fine here. Removing treecleaner@g.o from bug because this does not fit the criteria of us removing the package. It seems silly that it compares your system with one from 2005, and my system was lower on some test!? /me sighs, heh. Your call, Patrick. (stable-amd64-chroot) JOlaptop / # bashmark ####################################################### : T E S T : :S C O R E : : R A T I O: :-----------------------------------------------------: :Cpu, Integer : : 1581: : +47%: :Cpu, Floating point : : 1176: : +55%: : : : : : : :Memory r/w (cached) : : 2015: : +67%: :Memory de-/alloc : : 462: : -29%: : : : : : : :Multithreading : : 642: : -74%: ####################################################### : S Y S T E M I N F O : ------------------------------------------------------- 2x Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo T9300 @ 800.000MHz, L2 6144KB Linux 2.6.27.9 GCC 4.1.2 92KB binary size ####################################################### : R E F E R E N C E S Y S T E M I N F O : ------------------------------------------------------- Reference system was Geno's pc with: Athlon XP 1800+ 1575.631MHz, 256KB Linux 2.6.11-ck1 GCC 3.4.3-20050110 (compiled with standard cflags) glibc 2.3.4 (with nptl) 128KB binary size Scores gathered on March, 30th. 2005 with bashmark 0.6
Ah, cancel that about my system being lower than the reference one. The app never triggered my cpu governor to increase.
This should be closed, no?
