Bug 15124 – ufed 0.2: doesnt handle libg++

• Status: VERIFIED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Jonas Berlin 2003-02-04 14:46:34 UTC]

There are some entries that don't show up in ufed as selectable:
libg++ and ungif. My guess is that the flags in the list are taken
from the /usr/portage/profiles/use.defs file. The "ungif" wasn't
listed in this file, which would explain that. And my guess for
"libg++" is that the regexp used for parsing the use.defs file didn't
allow for "+" characters in the flag name.

--

If you need more info, or help testing or analyzing, or just don't
understand a word that I'm saying, please don't hesitate contact me.

 - xkr47 @ {freenode,ircnet,quakenet}

[Comment 1 SpanKY 2003-02-04 19:15:49 UTC]

ungif is not a valid USE variable, if you found it in some ebuild it should be filed as a 
bug 

[Comment 2 Jonas Berlin 2003-02-05 03:22:16 UTC]

ungif was mentioned in /etc/make.profile/use.defaults
(listed in the "FILES" section of emerge's manpage)
(I have the default-x86-1.4 profile)

.. but then again, I'm not entirely sure of what it's purpose is..

[Comment 3 SpanKY 2003-02-05 11:43:15 UTC]

ungif will be taken care of ... this bug report now concerns the inability of ufed to parse 
+ 

[Comment 4 Dries Harnie 2003-03-29 11:55:17 UTC]

Created attachment 9993 [details, diff]
ufed 0.2: doesnt handle libg++ => now it does :)

[Comment 5 Robin Johnson 2003-04-04 23:27:40 UTC]

I don't know if I'll get to this by the end of the package upgrade phase on sunday, but it is in the todo list (I have finals shortly so that's my delay).

Thanks for the patch

[Comment 6 Robin Johnson 2003-04-25 04:25:29 UTC]

fixed in ufed 0.3 in unstable.

[Comment 7 Robin Johnson 2003-08-12 01:21:49 UTC]

Closing bug properly.

[Comment 8 Robin Johnson 2003-09-25 18:12:02 UTC]

closing bug again.

[Comment 9 Robin Johnson 2003-09-25 18:12:12 UTC]

closing bug again.