Bug 131205 – Version Bump: gthumb 2.7.5.1 released

• Status: VERIFIED WONTFIX
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description crusaderky 2006-04-25 04:39:24 UTC]

Attached ebuild works flawlessly for me.

[Comment 1 crusaderky 2006-04-25 04:40:22 UTC]

Created attachment 85446 [details]
gthumb-2.7.5.1.ebuild

[Comment 2 foser (RETIRED) 2006-04-25 08:25:37 UTC]

unstable release series

[Comment 3 crusaderky 2006-04-25 09:25:00 UTC]

<O_O> actually, it's perfectly usable although somehow less stable than 2.6.x.
I really don't see what's the problem in making it ~x86, while 2.6.x remains tagged as x86.

[Comment 4 foser (RETIRED) 2006-04-25 13:56:45 UTC]

actually we don't care, ~arch is not for unstable stuff.

[Comment 5 Daniel Gryniewicz (RETIRED) 2006-05-04 14:47:50 UTC]

We don't put development releases into portage.

[Comment 6 crusaderky 2006-05-04 16:10:37 UTC]

Apart from the fact that it IS reasonably stable - I've been using it with satisfaction for almost 2 weeks now - if you consider a thing "unstable", you should just mask and let the users decide.

[Comment 7 Daniel Gryniewicz (RETIRED) 2006-05-07 19:56:02 UTC]

It's not a matter of stable/unstable, it's a matter of stable/development.  Development is odd-numbered minor numbers.  We don't put those into portage, as a matter of policy, no matter how "stable" they are.  When upstream release a "stable" version (with an even minor number, for gnome 2.16.0), we'll put it into portage.