Attached ebuild works flawlessly for me.
Created attachment 85446 [details]
unstable release series
<O_O> actually, it's perfectly usable although somehow less stable than 2.6.x.
I really don't see what's the problem in making it ~x86, while 2.6.x remains tagged as x86.
actually we don't care, ~arch is not for unstable stuff.
We don't put development releases into portage.
Apart from the fact that it IS reasonably stable - I've been using it with satisfaction for almost 2 weeks now - if you consider a thing "unstable", you should just mask and let the users decide.
It's not a matter of stable/unstable, it's a matter of stable/development. Development is odd-numbered minor numbers. We don't put those into portage, as a matter of policy, no matter how "stable" they are. When upstream release a "stable" version (with an even minor number, for gnome 2.16.0), we'll put it into portage.