I cannot see chinese character when i change to UTF-8 according to the official gentoo documents. Here is the solution, but i hope anyone can port it into portage system: $ wget http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2005-07/bineYgga7Cm9p.bin -O groff-utf8.tar.gz $ tar zxf groff-utf8.tar.gz $ cd groff-utf8 $ sudo make install PREFIX=/usr/local # cat /etc/man.conf wrote: TROFF /usr/local/bin/groff-utf8 -Tutf8 -mandoc NROFF /usr/local/bin/groff-utf8 -Tutf8 -mandoc
looks to me like it isnt needed: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2006-02/msg00086.html
(In reply to comment #1) > looks to me like it isnt needed: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2006-02/msg00086.html > No. the current version of groff does not support CJK utf-8.
by "current version" do you mean 1.19.2 or current cvs head ? either way, groff 1.18.x is still in portage for cjk users if you want newer versions fixed, get it integrated upstream
*** Bug 137787 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 188742 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 146365 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 121502 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 93664 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 104593 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 211547 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
I am sorry to make a noise here. Now groff-1.18.x is out of portage tree, and what can we do now? Using groff-utf8. I remembered that 1.18.x keeps working in CJK environment, but 1.19.x doesn't not.
looks to me like cjk support is in 1.19.x. if it isnt working for you, file a new bug so the cjk team can look at it.
I have a similar problem with dnsmasq man (8) page where accented characters didn't look right. I took a look at the compressed file /usr/share/man/fr/man8/dnsmasq.8.bz2 and it turned up the compressed text file was UTF-8. I then uncompressed it, recode it to iso8859-1 and re-packed it. The problem is now fixed. Should I file a bug to the maintainers of dnsmasq accordingly?
*** Bug 235305 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***