Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 123614 - dependency calculation problem with masked ebuilds and installed packages
Summary: dependency calculation problem with masked ebuilds and installed packages
Status: VERIFIED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Unspecified (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-02-21 06:41 UTC by tim
Modified: 2006-02-21 07:54 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description tim 2006-02-21 06:41:49 UTC
hi all,

i've got the following problem: i've masked the latest python release in /etc/portage/packages.mask with:
>=dev-lang/python-2.4.2
because one application i have doesn't work with it ...

but when updating sys-apps/dbus, which requires >=dev-lang/python-2.4 i get the following error message:

!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=dev-lang/python-2.4" have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
- dev-lang/python-2.4.2-r1 (masked by: package.mask)
- dev-lang/python-2.4.2 (masked by: package.mask)

this is correct, but i have python-2.4.1 installed, so portage shouldn't be required to update it ...
Comment 1 Tristan Heaven (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-21 06:51:27 UTC
2.4.1 doesn't exist anymore, so you have effectively masked >2.3.5-r2.
Comment 2 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-21 07:08:22 UTC
Not a bug, kindly read http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=3
Comment 3 tim 2006-02-21 07:17:23 UTC
@1:
not quite correct: /var/db/pkg/dev-lang/python-2.4.1-r1/python-2.4.1-r1.ebuild 

@2:
you're right, not a bug, but a feature request ...

of course i could add the 2.4.1-r1 ebuild to my portage overlay, but i'd prefer a cleaner solution
Comment 4 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-21 07:22:07 UTC
Don't reopen this bug unless you've completely read and understood the document linked above. Bugzilla is not a support forum for self-inflicted problems, use forums.gentoo.org, IRC or mailing lists.

INVALID.
Comment 5 tim 2006-02-21 07:54:28 UTC
jakub, sorry for having a suggestion, how to improve portage ... will do the quick hack with my local overlay then ...

note, that you invalidly marked then bug invalid, since i reopened the bug after reading the document (about one or two years ago). also i think, one can formulate bugzilla comments in friendly way without SCREAMING