Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 213988
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: NEW
Resolution:
Assigned To: Docs Team <docs-team@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 213988 depends on: 218593 Show dependency tree
Bug 213988 blocks: 212696 218141 218302 218859 219038 260761 295613
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.








View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2008-03-20 05:10 0000
This bug is intended to track any and all documentation changes that need to
happen to successfully land OpenRC into Gentoo. It's also a meta bug for a
migration guide that I would like to write with a member of the docs team. I've
already shot an e-mail off to nightmorph about that.

------- Comment #1 From Doug Goldstein 2008-04-15 05:57:09 0000 -------
softlevel= as a kernel parameter will be replaced by rc_runlevel= in OpenRC
0.2.2 and higher

------- Comment #2 From Wolfram Schlich 2008-04-15 08:19:50 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> softlevel= as a kernel parameter will be replaced by rc_runlevel= in OpenRC
> 0.2.2 and higher

Will softlevel= still work until some version X (backward compatibility)?

------- Comment #3 From SpanKY 2008-04-15 13:36:33 0000 -------
of course

------- Comment #4 From Doug Goldstein 2008-04-15 18:15:07 0000 -------
When I said "replaced", I meant in a documentation stand point that we should
be promoting this as a the default parameter to set.

I'm just trying to keep notes on this bug rather then in my head or on a piece
of paper or a file that only I can access. That way, if I miss something.. or I
get something wrong.. someone else can contribute.

------- Comment #5 From Josh Saddler 2008-04-17 21:49:02 0000 -------
We only mention softlevel in two documents:

http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/power-management-guide.xml, which has two related
open bugs already (bug #205117 and bug #209258) -- this definitely needs some
fixes, which no one's coherently provided thus far.

http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/hb-working-rcscripts.xml

Please look through these docs and figure out what needs to be changed to what.
Our documentation will *not* be split into "stable baselayout-1" and "~arch
openrc" bits. I'd prefer to just default all instructions to OpenRC once it's
stable, since it doesn't look like baselayout-1 will be maintained after that
point.

All that being said, we're closer to fixing this tracker bug, as the openrc
migration guide is complete.

------- Comment #6 From Matthew Schultz 2008-04-24 15:25:34 0000 -------
The documentation net.example in particular needs to be updated.  Apparently
comments inside /etc/conf.d/net commands foul them up.

Example:

pppd_ppp0="
#       maxfail 0       # WARNING: It's not recommended you use this
#                       # if you don't specify maxfail then we assume 0
#       updetach        # If not set, "/etc/init.d/net.ppp0 start" will return
"

"/etc/init.d/net.ppp0 start" will cause it to not parse properly.

Also could you add documentation on what the syntax is for setting up two phone
numbers for dial up?

#phone_number_ppp0="12345689" # Maximum 2 phone numbers are supported

Used to be: 

phone_number_ppp0=( "12345689 "12345678")


Is it now this?

phone_number_ppp0="'12345689' '12345678'"

or?

phone_number_ppp0="12345689 12345678"

------- Comment #7 From Matthew Schultz 2008-04-24 15:26:40 0000 -------
Sorry old style syntax was this:

phone_number_ppp0=( "12345689" "12345678" )

------- Comment #8 From Duncan 2008-04-24 17:27:00 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> The documentation net.example in particular needs to be updated.

(This is a tracker so being brief.)  Note that the network config is still in
flux.  As the current GMN announcement states, this is ~arch for a reason. 
GMANE link to discussion thread with the details: 

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/55824

------- Comment #9 From Kundai Midzi 2008-05-05 08:53:33 0000 -------
Does anyone know where I can find the (official) developer docs for openrc. I'm
trying to find out the purpose of all the directories in /lib/rc/init.d. I'm
not sure about things such as "exclusive", "scheduled", etc.

------- Comment #10 From Doug Goldstein 2008-05-05 13:49:14 0000 -------
Not the bug for this..

------- Comment #11 From Peter Volkov 2008-10-15 17:41:37 0000 -------
May be bug 240984 could became addition here. At least part on
"The cold/hotplugging has now been moved into one variable - rc_hotplug"

------- Comment #12 From Doug Goldstein 2008-12-22 23:00:41 0000 -------
*** Bug 246119 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #13 From Josh Saddler 2009-04-15 06:54:01 0000 -------
*** Bug 260761 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #14 From Josh Saddler 2009-04-19 19:25:39 0000 -------
*** Bug 266785 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #15 From Rick Leijssen 2009-11-18 09:02:39 0000 -------
Not sure wether this is the right place for this (otherwise please point me to
the right place). 

I noticed in the gentoo handbook, the page on configuring your system
(http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-amd64.xml?part=1&chap=8) still
mentions that rc.conf has the EDITOR and DISPLAYMANAGER variables.

Also, the migration guide mentions to set the EDITOR variable in /etc/env.d
while the comments in /etc/profile suggest setting a system default for this in
/etc/profile.d.

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug