Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 125021
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Text-Markup Team <text-markup@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Sander Dijkhuis <sander.dijkhuis@gmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Flags: Requestee:
 
 
  ()

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 125021 depends on: 142267 Show dependency tree
Bug 125021 blocks: 81745

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2006-03-04 15:16 0000 
I don't know if this bug has already been filed and whether I'm doing it the
right way, but when trying to emerge texmacs, I'm getting this error:

scanelf: rpath_security_checks(): Security problem NULL DT_RPATH in
/var/tmp/portage/texmacs-1.0.6/image//usr/libexec/TeXmacs/bin/texmacs.bin
scanelf: rpath_security_checks(): Security problem NULL DT_RUNPATH in
/var/tmp/portage/texmacs-1.0.6/image//usr/libexec/TeXmacs/bin/texmacs.bin

QA Notice: the following files contain insecure RUNPATH's
 Please file a bug about this at http://bugs.gentoo.org/
 For more information on this issue, kindly review:
 http://bugs.gentoo.org/81745
:/usr/lib64 usr/libexec/TeXmacs/bin/texmacs.bin


!!! ERROR: app-office/texmacs-1.0.6 failed.
Call stack:
  ebuild.sh, line 1933:   Called dyn_install

!!! Aborting due to serious QA concerns with RUNPATH/RPATH

------- Comment #1 From solar 2006-03-05 08:03:22 0000 ------- 
The next ~arch portage revision will auto repair evil rpaths and not bail. 
Maintainers should still fix the packages they maintain as portage will only
die
with FEATURES=stricter (but that is a maintainer & QA problem) no longer
security@

http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124962

------- Comment #2 From Christian Faulhammer 2006-07-31 09:25:41 0000 ------- 
This problem no longer persists in the 1.0.6-r1 (tested it with
FEATURES="stricter"), so when that version is stabilized this bug can be
closed.

------- Comment #3 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-09-02 05:51:28 0000 ------- 
No longer a security issue w/ current stable portage, re-assigning.

------- Comment #4 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-11-26 06:10:22 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #2)
> This problem no longer persists in the 1.0.6-r1 (tested it with
> FEATURES="stricter"), so when that version is stabilized this bug can be
> closed.

Done now, and closing. ;)
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug