Bug 932369 – KDE Frameworks 5.116 and kde-apps/kio-extras-24.02.2-r1 stabilisation

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Andreas Sturmlechner 2024-05-21 15:00:55 UTC]

In preparation, very few fixes since 5.115 release.

[Comment 1 Frank Krömmelbein 2024-05-23 21:03:24 UTC]

There were no problems in my test run with Plasma 6.0.5, Gear 24.04.90 and KF6 6.2.0.
So I had to ignore the useflag -kf6compat.
I think another test run with Plasma 5 installed is not worth it, because there are only a few changes in KF 5.116.

Ignored useflags: -kf6compat and +gles2-only


Unfortunately, the main problem for an unmask of Plasma 6 & Co still seems to be the sddm issue in https://bugs.gentoo.org/925866
What are your plans for a stable version of Plasma 6 & co?
I won't be home for some time this summer, and testing these new main versions of Plasma 6, KF6 and Gear will initially be very time-consuming.
That's why it would be important for me to know early on and be able to test one or two sub-components in advance. So that I don't have to test all three at the same time.

[Comment 2 Andreas Sturmlechner 2024-05-27 15:19:33 UTC]

(In reply to Frank Krömmelbein from comment #1)
> There were no problems in my test run with Plasma 6.0.5, Gear 24.04.90 and
> KF6 6.2.0.
> So I had to ignore the useflag -kf6compat.
> I think another test run with Plasma 5 installed is not worth it, because
> there are only a few changes in KF 5.116.
> 
> Ignored useflags: -kf6compat and +gles2-only
Thanks for testing!

(In reply to Frank Krömmelbein from comment #1)
> What are your plans for a stable version of Plasma 6 & co?
> I won't be home for some time this summer, and testing these new main
> versions of Plasma 6, KF6 and Gear will initially be very time-consuming.
> That's why it would be important for me to know early on and be able to test
> one or two sub-components in advance. So that I don't have to test all three
> at the same time.
Since there are multiple inter-dependencies through optional runtime plugins, kparts et al. it is not possible to stabilise KF6 independently from Plasma or Gear, so the first stabilisation will contain all 3 of them.

[Comment 3 Arthur Zamarin 2024-05-27 18:11:06 UTC]

ppc done

[Comment 4 Arthur Zamarin 2024-05-27 18:11:46 UTC]

ppc64 done

[Comment 5 Sam James 2024-05-27 23:42:35 UTC]

amd64 done

[Comment 6 Sam James 2024-05-27 23:43:56 UTC]

x86 done

[Comment 7 Sam James 2024-05-27 23:48:26 UTC]

arm done

[Comment 8 Sam James 2024-05-28 02:07:38 UTC]

arm64 done

all arches done

[Comment 9 Andreas Sturmlechner 2024-06-23 12:38:11 UTC]

(In reply to Andreas Sturmlechner from comment #2)
> (In reply to Frank Krömmelbein from comment #1)
> > What are your plans for a stable version of Plasma 6 & co?
> > I won't be home for some time this summer, and testing these new main
> > versions of Plasma 6, KF6 and Gear will initially be very time-consuming.
> > That's why it would be important for me to know early on and be able to test
> > one or two sub-components in advance. So that I don't have to test all three
> > at the same time.
> Since there are multiple inter-dependencies through optional runtime
> plugins, kparts et al. it is not possible to stabilise KF6 independently
> from Plasma or Gear, so the first stabilisation will contain all 3 of them.

So, if you want to do early testing, you can take a look at the keywordreq bugs in order to get a roughly 1/3 2/3 split of all packages involved:

- KDE Plasma 6 and Frameworks 6 keywordreq: bug 934215
- KDE Gear 24.05.1 (KF6-based) keywordreq: bug 934361

This will ultimately culminate in bug 934478, but no date on that yet except maybe some time in August, and likely to be with none of the versions currently available in testing.

[Comment 10 Frank Krömmelbein 2024-07-02 19:04:52 UTC]

Yesterday I did a tatt test run with the current packages, it took ~21 hours.
It resulted in 147 entries which I then checked.
These 4 problems remain:

See:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=935362
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=935363
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=935364
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=935365

I will look at 3 other problems related to -speech useflag in the final run. But these can probably be ignored because I currently have +speech as a global useflag.