See ${URL}. Post says 5 security fixes, but only 3 have published CVEs. At least one is reported to be exploited in the wild. Presumably dev channel -90/-91 is also vulnerable; 91.0.4442.4 was released the same day, but Google does not enumerate security fixes in it: https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2021/03/dev-channel-update-for-desktop_12.html
Thank you for the report! Note that we don't include the fixed version in the summary until a fixed version is in tree. Maintainers, please bump.
(In reply to John Helmert III from comment #1) > Thank you for the report! Note that we don't include the fixed version in > the summary until a fixed version is in tree. Maintainers, please bump. Ah, thanks! I am never sure, and since there are many open chromium bugs from older versions, thought I should be specific. FWIW to maintainers, simply copying the existing chromium-89.0.4389.82.ebuild to chromium-89.0.4389.90.ebuild with zero changes built successfully. chromium-91.0.4442.4 looks more complicated, https://github.com/stha09/chromium-patches has not updated for -91 yet and I did not attempt to make my own.
Thank you!
amd64 stable
arm64 done
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=2dc10dc13eeec16ed5e3b6a894afa0ea3c5e6be6 commit 2dc10dc13eeec16ed5e3b6a894afa0ea3c5e6be6 Author: Stephan Hartmann <sultan@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-03-21 20:36:17 +0000 Commit: Stephan Hartmann <sultan@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-03-21 20:36:25 +0000 www-client/chromium: security cleanup Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/776181 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.13, Repoman-3.0.2 Signed-off-by: Stephan Hartmann <sultan@gentoo.org> www-client/chromium/Manifest | 1 - www-client/chromium/chromium-89.0.4389.72.ebuild | 899 ----------------------- 2 files changed, 900 deletions(-)
Added to an existing GLSA request.
This issue was resolved and addressed in GLSA 202104-08 at https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202104-08 by GLSA coordinator Thomas Deutschmann (whissi).
