Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bugzilla DB migration completed. Please report issues to Infra team via email via infra@gentoo.org or IRC
Bug 294497 (CVE-2009-4022) - <net-dns/bind-9.4.3_p4 DNSSEC Cache poisoning (CVE-2009-4022)
Summary: <net-dns/bind-9.4.3_p4 DNSSEC Cache poisoning (CVE-2009-4022)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: CVE-2009-4022
Product: Gentoo Security
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Vulnerabilities (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High trivial (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Security
URL: https://www.isc.org/node/504
Whiteboard: C3? [noglsa]
Keywords:
: 294570 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-11-24 22:51 UTC by Stefan Behte (RETIRED)
Modified: 2010-01-29 11:38 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Stefan Behte (RETIRED) gentoo-dev Security 2009-11-24 22:51:02 UTC
References:
https://www.isc.org/node/504
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/418861
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538744

Quoting from the redhat bug:
"ISC reports a cache poisoning flaw reported by Michael Sinatra of UC Berkeley
that may cause bind to cache replies that were not properly DNSSEC validated
when recursive query was done based on uncommon client query.

  A nameserver with DNSSEC validation enabled may incorrectly add records
  to its cache from the additional section of responses received during
  resolution of a recursive client query. This behavior only occurs when
  processing client queries with checking disabled (CD) at the same time
  as requesting DNSSEC records (DO).

This issue was reported to affect all 9.x versions and should be fixed in
9.4.3-P4, 9.5.2-P1 and 9.6.1-P2."

Upgrade BIND to one of the following: 9.4.3-P4, 9.5.2-P1 or 9.6.1-P2.
Comment 1 Stefan Behte (RETIRED) gentoo-dev Security 2009-11-24 22:56:50 UTC
Voxus, bind herd, can you provide new ebuilds?
Comment 2 Hanno Böck gentoo-dev 2009-11-25 14:36:55 UTC
*** Bug 294570 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Alex Legler (RETIRED) archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2009-11-26 08:26:24 UTC
CVE-2009-4022 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2009-4022):
  Unspecified vulnerability in ISC BIND 9.4 before 9.4.3-P4, 9.5 before
  9.5.2-P1, 9.6 before 9.6.1-P2, 9.7 beta before 9.7.0b3, and 9.0.x
  through 9.3.x with DNSSEC validation enabled and checking disabled
  (CD), allows remote attackers to conduct DNS cache poisoning attacks
  via additional sections in a response sent for resolution of a
  recursive client query, which is not properly handled when the
  response is processed "at the same time as requesting DNSSEC records
  (DO)."

Comment 4 Christian Ruppert (idl0r) archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2009-11-26 17:59:02 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Voxus, bind herd, can you provide new ebuilds?
> 

Done.
net-dns/bind-9.4.3_p4 and net-dns/bind-9.6.1_p2 are in tree now.
Comment 5 Robert Buchholz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-12-02 20:45:25 UTC
Arches, please test and mark stable:
=net-dns/bind-9.4.3_p4
Target keywords : "alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 ppc ppc64 s390 sh sparc x86"
Comment 6 Jeroen Roovers gentoo-dev 2009-12-03 02:19:41 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Arches, please test and mark stable:
> =net-dns/bind-9.4.3_p4
> Target keywords : "alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 ppc ppc64 s390 sh sparc x86"

And =net-dns/bind-tools-9.4.3_p4 naturally.
Comment 7 Jeroen Roovers gentoo-dev 2009-12-03 06:12:09 UTC
Both stable for HPPA.
Comment 8 Markus Meier gentoo-dev 2009-12-03 10:56:45 UTC
amd64/arm/x86 stable
Comment 9 Brent Baude (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-12-08 14:36:33 UTC
ppc64 done
Comment 10 Jeroen Roovers gentoo-dev 2009-12-09 15:38:33 UTC
Stable for PPC.
Comment 11 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-12-09 18:53:07 UTC
alpha/ia64/s390/sh/sparc stable
Comment 12 Stefan Behte (RETIRED) gentoo-dev Security 2009-12-18 02:11:52 UTC
GLSA vote: no.
Comment 13 Jeroen Roovers gentoo-dev 2010-01-27 18:16:10 UTC
ppc64 forgot about bind-tools.
Comment 14 Brent Baude (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-01-27 18:41:12 UTC
got -tools for ppc64 now
Comment 15 Stefan Behte (RETIRED) gentoo-dev Security 2010-01-27 19:26:42 UTC
jer: why do need bind-tools to go stable for a bug in bind?
Comment 16 Jeroen Roovers gentoo-dev 2010-01-29 04:11:46 UTC
(In reply to comment #15)
> jer: why do need bind-tools to go stable for a bug in bind?

Because, if you happen to run a named, you would want the tools' version and patch level to match the server's. Both packages are compiled from the same source tarball too.
Comment 17 Tobias Heinlein (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-01-29 11:06:14 UTC
NO too, closing.
Comment 18 Stefan Behte (RETIRED) gentoo-dev Security 2010-01-29 11:38:32 UTC
>Because, if you happen to run a named, you would want the tools' version and
>patch level to match the server's.

No, why would I?

diff -ur does not show differences in the tools (correct me, if I'm wrong), so why should we care to update them, too?