CVE-2009-3940 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2009-3940): Unspecified vulnerability in Guest Additions in Sun xVM VirtualBox 1.6.x and 2.0.x before 2.0.12, 2.1.x, and 2.2.x, and Sun VirtualBox before 3.0.10, allows guest OS users to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) on the guest OS via unknown vectors.
Can we go stable with 3.0.10 or 3.0.12?
(In reply to comment #1) > Can we go stable with 3.0.10 or 3.0.12? > 3.0.12 should be good to go.
Involved packages (hope I didn't forget anyone): =net-libs/gsoap-2.7.13 =app-emulation/virtualbox-bin-3.0.12 =app-emulation/virtualbox-guest-additions-3.0.12 =app-emulation/virtualbox-modules-3.0.12 =app-emulation/virtualbox-ose-3.0.12 =app-emulation/virtualbox-ose-additions-3.0.12 =x11-drivers/xf86-input-virtualbox-3.0.12 =x11-drivers/xf86-video-virtualbox-3.0.12
(In reply to comment #3) > =net-libs/gsoap-2.7.13 already stable > =app-emulation/virtualbox-bin-3.0.12 > =app-emulation/virtualbox-guest-additions-3.0.12 > =app-emulation/virtualbox-modules-3.0.12 > =app-emulation/virtualbox-ose-3.0.12 > =app-emulation/virtualbox-ose-additions-3.0.12 > =x11-drivers/xf86-input-virtualbox-3.0.12 > =x11-drivers/xf86-video-virtualbox-3.0.12 Arches, please test and mark stable ^^ Target keywords : "amd64 x86"
x86 stable
amd64 stable, all arches done.
GLSA Voting: NO.
No, too. Closing noglsa.
Though we have two NOs here, I'd like this to be included in the GLSA for bug 288836. I just modified the draft.
GLSA 201001-04, thanks everyone.