Summary: | dev-lang/rust-1.80.1 fails to compile: SmallVector.h:119:62: error: uint64_t was not declared in this scope | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Agostino Sarubbo <ago> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Randy Barlow <randy> |
Status: | CONFIRMED --- | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | matoro_gentoo, navi, rust |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 932474 | ||
Attachments: | build.log.xz |
Description
Agostino Sarubbo
2024-09-12 07:16:15 UTC
Created attachment 902695 [details]
build.log.xz
build log and emerge --info (compressed because it exceeds attachment limit, use 'xzless' to read it)
Error(s) that match a know pattern in addition to what has been reported in the summary: -- Could NOT find OCaml (missing: OCAMLFIND OCAML_VERSION OCAML_STDLIB_PATH) -- Could NOT find Python module pygments -- Could NOT find Python module pygments.lexers.c_cpp -- Could NOT find Python module yaml 301 | declare_error_trait!(Error: Sized + StdError); FAILED: lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Allocator.cpp.o FAILED: lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/BalancedPartitioning.cpp.o FAILED: lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Base64.cpp.o FAILED: lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o FAILED: lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/ConvertEBCDIC.cpp.o FAILED: lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/circular_raw_ostream.cpp.o RuntimeError: failed to run: /var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/rust-1.80.1/work/rustc-1.80.1-src/build/bootstrap/debug/bootstrap build -vvv --config=/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/rust-1.80.1/work/rustc-1.80.1-src/config.toml -j32 thread 'main' panicked at /var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/rust-1.80.1/work/rustc-1.80.1-src/vendor/cmake-0.1.48/src/lib.rs:975:5: /var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/rust-1.80.1/work/rustc-1.80.1-src/src/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:119:62: error: ‘uint64_t’ was not declared in this scope Dupe of bug 937525 ? |