Bug 936288

Summary:	CDN/bouncer inconsistency for binpkgs between Packages index and binpkgs themselves
Product:	Gentoo Infrastructure	Reporter:	Sam James <sam>
Component:	Other	Assignee:	Gentoo Infrastructure <infra-bugs>
Status:	CONFIRMED ---
Severity:	normal	CC:	binhost, eschwartz
Priority:	Normal
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
See Also:	https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=936287 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=936286 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=936289
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---

Description Sam James archtester

2024-07-19 08:09:44 UTC

As described at https://bugs.gentoo.org/936287#c0, this is 2) for the infra side.

"""
2) On the infra side, there's inconsistency between the host which serves us the binhost Packages index vs the binpkgs themselves.

This manifests often as:
```
>>> Running pre-merge checks for sys-apps/portage-3.0.65-r1
--2024-07-19 08:00:16--  https://mirror.bytemark.co.uk/gentoo/releases/amd64/binpackages/23.0/x86-64/sys-apps/portage/portage-3.0.65-r1-1.gpkg.tar
Resolving mirror.bytemark.co.uk... 2001:41c8:20:5fc::13, 2001:41c8:20:5e6::150, 80.68.83.150, ...
Connecting to mirror.bytemark.co.uk|2001:41c8:20:5fc::13|:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
2024-07-19 08:00:16 ERROR 404: Not Found.
```
"""

Comment 1 Sam James archtester

2024-07-19 08:26:31 UTC

I should've really used bouncer.gentoo.org (or distfiles.gentoo.org?) here as the bytemark thing is seemingly something else (bug 936289).