Summary: | stable request for DAHDI 3.2.0 packages | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Jaco Kroon <jaco> |
Component: | Stabilization | Assignee: | Jaco Kroon <jaco> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | major | CC: | amd64, proxy-maint, x86 |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | CC-ARCHES, PMASKED, STABLEREQ |
Version: | unspecified | Flags: | nattka:
sanity-check-
|
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=907215 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: |
=net-misc/dahdi-tools-3.2.0
=net-misc/dahdi-3.2.0
|
Runtime testing required: | No |
Description
Jaco Kroon
2023-06-08 06:24:57 UTC
I'm running into bug 906179 it seems. cc1: some warnings being treated as errors cc1: some warnings being treated as errors /var/tmp/portage/net-misc/dahdi-3.1.0-r3/work/dahdi-linux-3.1.0/drivers/dahdi/xpp/xpp_usb.c:1112:55: error: implicit declaration of function 'PDE_DATA'; did you mean 'NODE_DATA'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration[https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html#index-Wimplicit-function-declaration]] 1112 | return single_open(file, xusb_read_proc_show, PDE_DATA(inode)); | ^~~~~~~~ | NODE_DATA etc. Damn. This environment nowadays is just too fast changing. Going to need a few days, let's hold off on this one then. Do we have a way of determining how many DAHDI users we still have out there, ideally short of masking net-misc/dahdi{,-tools}? I've got one host and frankly, at this stage I'm considering spending the money to rather get a SIP2PRI gateway just to get rid of this mess. Unable to check for sanity:
> package masked: net-misc/dahdi-tools-3.2.0
Last-rited, please see bug #914477. Unable to check for sanity:
> no match for package: =net-misc/dahdi-tools-3.2.0
Unable to check for sanity:
> package masked: net-misc/dahdi-tools-3.2.0
Killing this since we cannot stable 3.2.0. |