Bug 906651

Summary:	dev-lang/elixir-1.14.3 invalid dependency
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	tomas charvat <tc>
Component:	Current packages	Assignee:	Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier <contact>
Status:	RESOLVED INVALID
Severity:	normal	CC:	proxy-maint, tc
Priority:	Normal
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
URL:	https://hexdocs.pm/elixir/1.14/compatibility-and-deprecations.html#compatibility-between-elixir-and-erlang-otp
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---

Description tomas charvat 2023-05-17 21:33:27 UTC

According to URL elixie 1.14 support Erlang23-25, following limitation is not needed

>=dev-lang/erlang-23:0/25.1.2=[ssl] required by (dev-lang/elixir-1.14.3:0/0::gentoo, installed)

This report is related to https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=906650
Elixir is pulled in by rabbitmq and they both depend on old erlang.

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 tomas charvat 2023-05-17 21:35:27 UTC

This may be solved by dev-lang/elixir-1.14.4 version bump 
https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/blob/v1.14.4/CHANGELOG.md

Comment 2 Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier 2023-05-20 14:00:36 UTC

Did you misread?
It's just `>=dev-lang/erlang-23:0=[ssl]` in the recipe, meaning 24.x and 25.x are fine (in fact 25.x is what I run on my machines), it just needs a rebuild not a recipe change.

Comment 3 tomas charvat 2024-04-12 17:20:07 UTC

Yes I did miss read, thanks for clarification.

dev-lang/erlang:0

  (dev-lang/erlang-26.2.1:0/26.2.1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) USE="kpoll ssl -doc -emacs -java -odbc -sctp -systemd -tk -wxwidgets" conflicts with
    <dev-lang/erlang-26 required by (dev-lang/elixir-1.14.3-r1:0/0::gentoo, installed) USE="-test"
    ^                ^^
    <dev-lang/erlang-26.2 required by (net-misc/rabbitmq-server-3.12.9:0/0::gentoo, installed) USE=""
    ^                ^^^^
    >=dev-lang/erlang-23:0/25.3=[ssl] required by (dev-lang/elixir-1.14.3-r1:0/0::gentoo, installed) USE="-test"


I did interpret "<" in "<dev-lang/erlang-26.2 required by" as angled bracket and not less then.

Sorry for miss-understanding. This whole report was false.