Summary: | New application request : net-analyser/smtpmap | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Michael Zanetta <grimmlin> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Default Assignee for New Packages <maintainer-wanted> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | netmon, soulse |
Priority: | High | Keywords: | EBUILD |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://www.projectiwear.org/~plasmahh/software.html | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
smtpmap-0.8_beta.ebuild
smtpmap-build-error.txt gcc-3.4.patch smtpmap-0.8.234_beta.ebuild |
Description
Michael Zanetta
2005-03-29 02:54:44 UTC
Created attachment 54748 [details]
smtpmap-0.8_beta.ebuild
Created attachment 55346 [details]
smtpmap-build-error.txt
Posting this mainly for myself (so I can come back and look at it once I have
the time). Looks like it needs some gcc loving. Builds fine with gcc-3.3.x but
not gcc-3.4.x or gcc-4.
URL is not more reachable. There a mirror at packetstorm : http://packetstormsecurity.org/UNIX/scanners/smtpmap-0.8-beta.tar.gz Better late than never, i made a patch to fix the compilation on gcc 3.4 and updated the ebuild. I don't have gcc 4.x but i'll try to install it tomorrow maybe... Created attachment 90475 [details, diff]
gcc-3.4.patch
Created attachment 90476 [details]
smtpmap-0.8.234_beta.ebuild
Compile and works with gcc 4.1.1 Hey Michael, I did try it out and it seems to be a nice little program. Without an active upstream I see the signatures getting out of date and the code creep of gcc/glibc causing troubles for us in the future. If it starts developing again I'd be keen to include it but for now the team is struggling with the other 42 bugs open. From URL: "SMTPMAP Currently, smtpmap is dead. As nmap does a quite ok job, that seems to fit the needs of most of the users, smtpmap will not be developed anymore, unless there is enough public demand." (In reply to comment #8) > I did try it out and it seems to be a nice little program. Without an active > upstream I see the signatures getting out of date and the code creep of > gcc/glibc causing troubles for us in the future. If it starts developing again > I'd be keen to include it but for now the team is struggling with the other 42 > bugs open. Hi Daniel, No problem. At least, it will be available with the patches for ppl needing it. Cheers |