Summary: | please mark sys-fs/sysfsutils-1.2.0-r2 stable | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Hanno Böck <hanno> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Greg Kroah-Hartman (RETIRED) <gregkh> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | david.w.noon, robbat2 |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Hanno Böck
2005-02-22 09:15:06 UTC
This version still places libsysfs.so under /usr/lib, in spite of the fact that multipath-tools could need it before /usr is mounted, i.e. when /usr is on a LVM2 logical volume. This library should really be under /lib on the root filesystem. Here is a link to bug #71703, which is a report of the erroneous placement of libsysfs.so. This package should not, IMO, be marked stable until it fixes this other bug. [People who don't use udev and LVM2 together might disagree, but those of us who do find this bug annoying.] arch teams: could you please test sysfsutils-1.2.0-r2 and mark stable? The only change from -r0 is the write_attribute fix in -r1 and in -r2 installing the shared libs into /lib so that they can be used before /usr is available. stable on ppc64 ia64 done Stable on hppa Why did you close this? x86 there.. and please put the category in the summary when you request stuff from arches, makes out lives a little bit easier (In reply to comment #7) > Why did you close this? sorry, my bad. just forgot what bug I was working on. arm/alpha are done |