Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 76809

Summary: nautilus 2.8.2 does not recognize scripts in folder "nautilus-scripts"
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: Aaron Bohannon <webmail>
Component: [OLD] GNOMEAssignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: normal CC: linux
Priority: High    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---
Bug Depends on: 66195    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Aaron Bohannon 2005-01-05 12:53:43 UTC
Nautilus 2.8.2-r1 (and perhaps other 2.8 versions) does not recognize scripts that are placed in the "~/.gnome2/nautilus-scripts" directory.  My scripts were working fine in 2.6 and were no longer recognized after the upgrade, nor did they work in a freshly installed Gentoo OS with Nautilus 2.8.2.  If there is a subdirectory in the nautilus-scripts folder, then nautilus will display the "Scripts" menu item and will show the subdirectory in the menu, but will not show any of the executable scripts in the top-level scripts directory or any of the subdirectories.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Put an executable file in the folder "~/.gnome2/nautilus-scripts".
2. Check the File menu in Nautilus.


Actual Results:  
There is no "Scripts" menu item.

Expected Results:  
There should be a "Scripts" menu item with the name of the script in a submenu.

Portage 2.0.51-r3 (default-linux/x86/2004.3, gcc-3.3.4, glibc-2.3.4.20040808-r1,
2.6.9-gentoo-r13 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.9-gentoo-r13 i686 Mobile Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 - M CPU
1.70GHzGentoo Base System version 1.4.16
Autoconf: sys-devel/autoconf-2.59-r5
Automake: sys-devel/automake-1.8.5-r1
Binutils: sys-devel/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1
Headers:  sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.4.21-r1
Libtools: sys-devel/libtool-1.5.2-r5
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-O3 -march=pentium4 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
-fprefetch-loop-arrays -pipe"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
COMPILER=""
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb /usr/kde/2/share/config
/usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/config
/usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config/ /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/
/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/platex/config/
/usr/share/texmf/xdvi/ /var/qmail/control"CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf
/etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-O3 -march=pentium4 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
-fprefetch-loop-arrays -pipe"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs autoconfig ccache distlocks fixpackages sandbox sfperms"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="ftp://gentoo.mirrors.pair.com/"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY=""
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 X aac acpi aim alsa apache2 apm avi berkdb bitmap-fonts crypt cups
divx4linux doc encode esd exif fam flac foomaticdb fortran gdbm gif gnome gpm
gstreamer gtk gtk2 imagemagick ipv6 java jpeg libwww mad mikmod mmx motif
mozilla mozsvg mpeg msn ncurses offensive oggvorbis opengl pam pcmcia pdflib
perl php png pnp ppds python quicktime readline recode samba scanner sdl sox
speex spell sse ssl svg tcltk tcpd tetex theora tiff truetype unicode usb
vim-with-x wavelan xinerama xml xml2 xmms xv yahoo zlib"
Comment 1 Mike Gardiner (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-01-10 20:00:06 UTC
I have a funny feeling that this is missing from 2.8 versions of nautilus, I think I read it somewhere, needs investigation.
Comment 2 Joe McCann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-01-11 00:09:23 UTC
Scripts work fine for me with latest versions of nautilus
Comment 3 Andreas Volz 2005-01-12 10:15:07 UTC
*** Bug 77713 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 TGL 2005-01-15 10:19:14 UTC
According to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153734 the issue comes from shared-mime-info-0.14, and should be fixed by 0.15 (which is masked in portage).
Comment 5 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-01-15 10:59:17 UTC
see bug #66195 for what needs to be done.
Comment 6 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-03-02 14:12:34 UTC
well #66195 .. no testreplies on that one.. assume since noone is complaining that it got fixed.

Marked 0.14-r2 x86 stable.