Summary: | net-misc/unison-2.47.15_p4-r2: Current dev-ml/findlib versions break unison compatiblity | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Stefan Huber <shuber> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | No maintainer - Look at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers if you want to take care of it <maintainer-needed> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | gentoo, gienah, sam |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Stefan Huber
2020-12-20 18:22:00 UTC
Sorry Stefan. I've not been ignoring you - just been busy with everything else and wanted to have time to think properly about a solution here. I guess I need to restore the old findlib with a < dep for now? (In reply to Sam James from comment #1) > Sorry Stefan. I've not been ignoring you - just been busy with everything > else and wanted to have time to think properly about a solution here. Thanks for the feedback! > I guess I need to restore the old findlib with a < dep for now? I also believe that this would work for now. The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=73b6349cc23be7639100ff7f759516d6e28157a8 commit 73b6349cc23be7639100ff7f759516d6e28157a8 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-12-20 18:41:02 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-12-20 18:43:08 +0000 dev-ml/findlib: lower the minimum OCaml version Some users still need an older version of OCaml for e.g. Unison where there are compatibility issues we need to handle. Thanks-to: Stefan Huber <shuber@sthu.org> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/755257 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/760911 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.9, Repoman-3.0.2 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> .../findlib/{findlib-1.8.1-r1.ebuild => findlib-1.8.1-r2.ebuild} | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (In reply to Stefan Huber from comment #2) > (In reply to Sam James from comment #1) > > Sorry Stefan. I've not been ignoring you - just been busy with everything > > else and wanted to have time to think properly about a solution here. > > Thanks for the feedback! > > > I guess I need to restore the old findlib with a < dep for now? > > I also believe that this would work for now. Let's try the easier one first and go from there. Maybe nudging people into an upgrade with my first area (or explicitly not) will somehow be needed, we'll see. With the *other bugs*, I've done some reading and I think I'm happy with what we need to do now. I don't want to rush applying the fix before I have to go do some other things, but I'll put this firmly near the top of the TODO. Thanks for your help! |