Summary: | app-admin/perl-cleaner: x11-terms/rxvt-unicode: perl-cleaner had to rebuild this package after the upgrade | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Anton Bolshakov <anton.bugs> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Perl team <perl> |
Status: | RESOLVED CANTFIX | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | Aidenn0, alarig, ashl1future, dan, goosewood, jer, kentnl, kingjon3377, pavkoz22, viklevin2, v_talin |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686950 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 697596 |
Description
Anton Bolshakov
2017-04-16 10:18:53 UTC
*** Bug 618932 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** I confirm this bug. The same after upgrading perl from 5.24 to 5.26. In upgrading from 5.24 to 5.26 I have an addition app: - net-irc/kvirc:0 I think the best solution of having many reports is to make only one bug with the whole list of applications involved in the case. Don't you think so, devs? Should we merge this with the earliest non-resolved report about such type of case into bug 589874 ? Maybe the perl team can explain what the problem is and what should be done about it. (In reply to Alexey Shildyakov from comment #4) > In upgrading from 5.24 to 5.26 I have an addition app: > - net-irc/kvirc:0 That's an entirely different package. > I think the best solution of having many reports is to make only one bug > with the whole list of applications involved in the case. Don't you think > so, devs? No, one bug report per package is what we normally do. > Should we merge this with the earliest non-resolved report about such type > of case into bug 589874 ? That looks like a completely different bug. (In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #5) > Maybe the perl team can explain what the problem is and what should be done > about it. Its usually either "Portage is stupid and doesn't handle leafs in subslot upgrades properly" or "User has installed an old version of package that doesn't use subslots, and so wasn't considered for upgrade" But without more data about the situation at hand, I couldn't even guess what the problem is other than EINVALID *** Bug 674722 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** I use x11-terms/rxvt-unicode-9.22-r2 The same bug is reproduced after upgrading to dev-lang/perl-5.28.0-r1 net-dialup/freeradius:0 x11-terms/rxvt-unicode:0 net-irc/kvirc:0 The ebuilds are all OK, so this is either perl-cleaner or portage problem. |