Summary: | app-emulation/virtualbox-guest-additions-5.1.14 : /.../jump_label.h:295:65: error: ‘__builtin_types_compatible_p’ was not declared in this scope | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Toralf Förster <toralf> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) (RETIRED) <polynomial-c> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | andrew.daniel.price, kajanos, masterzorag, paolo.pedroni, s.takekawa |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=603472 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 582084 | ||
Attachments: |
emerge-info.txt
app-emulation:virtualbox-guest-additions-5.1.14:20170128-124418.log.bz2 emerge-history.txt environment etc.portage.tbz2 Fix sloppy printk C++ version of __READ_ONCE |
Description
Toralf Förster
2017-01-28 14:21:43 UTC
Created attachment 461712 [details]
emerge-info.txt
Created attachment 461714 [details]
app-emulation:virtualbox-guest-additions-5.1.14:20170128-124418.log.bz2
Created attachment 461716 [details]
emerge-history.txt
Created attachment 461718 [details]
environment
Created attachment 461720 [details]
etc.portage.tbz2
The same. Same here Same problem here. Created attachment 464366 [details, diff]
Fix sloppy printk
Created attachment 464368 [details, diff]
C++ version of __READ_ONCE
With the two patches just uploaded( Fix sloppy printk, C++ version of __READ_ONCE) and this diff to the ebuild: --- a/virtualbox-guest-additions-5.1.14.ebuild 2017-02-19 19:38:41.490542701 +0100 +++ b/virtualbox-guest-additions-5.1.14.ebuild 2017-02-19 18:01:54.032052975 +0100 @@ -122,7 +122,8 @@ MAKE="kmk" \ emake TOOL_YASM_AS=yasm \ VBOX_ONLY_ADDITIONS=1 \ - KBUILD_VERBOSE=2 + KBUILD_VERBOSE=2 \ + CXXFLAGS="-fpermissive -D__builtin_types_compatible_p\(x,y\)=1" it builds. Don't know it it works, can anyone confirm? Oops, wrong bug, should have been: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=603472 I do think this is close to your problem too. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 603472 *** |