| Summary: | sys-fs/ecryptfs-utils-111 version bump | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Machredsch <recycle> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Crypto team [DISABLED] <crypto+disabled> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | asturm, kaikaikai, kripton, tamiko |
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | https://launchpad.net/ecryptfs/trunk/111 | ||
| See Also: | https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/9576 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 572500, 697700 | ||
|
Description
Machredsch
2016-09-27 10:48:23 UTC
Simply renaming the ebuild does the trick. Please bump :-) +1 Version 108 fails to build, while 111 is ok (bug 662576). Should not bug 572500 be marked here by "fixes" words instead of "blocks"? At lesat that bug depends on this (572500). (In reply to Nikita Zlobin from comment #3) > Should not bug 572500 be marked here by "fixes" words instead of "blocks"? > At lesat that bug depends on this (572500). I don't understand what you're trying to say here; bug A blocks B means B depends on A , i.e A can not be resolved before B is resolved. (In reply to Kristian Fiskerstrand from comment #4) > (In reply to Nikita Zlobin from comment #3) > > Should not bug 572500 be marked here by "fixes" words instead of "blocks"? > > At lesat that bug depends on this (572500). > > I don't understand what you're trying to say here; bug A blocks B means B > depends on A , i.e A can not be resolved before B is resolved. meh, meaning B can not be resolved before A is solved... confused myself there :) Machredsch, it appears it would make more sense to attach your ebuild diff to this bug as crypto team probably does not look at github. The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=c8d52e5c7308ae8eb0b87cc373289b0385d896a9 commit c8d52e5c7308ae8eb0b87cc373289b0385d896a9 Author: Ben Kohler <bkohler@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2019-10-14 15:06:01 +0000 Commit: Ben Kohler <bkohler@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2019-10-14 15:07:49 +0000 sys-fs/ecryptfs-utils: bump to new snapshot Version bump bug has been open over 3 years with no known blocking problems. I'm doing a non-maintainer bump to fix several outstanding issues. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/572500 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/595264 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/697700 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/694104 Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12464 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.76, Repoman-2.3.17 Signed-off-by: Ben Kohler <bkohler@gentoo.org> sys-fs/ecryptfs-utils/Manifest | 1 + .../ecryptfs-utils-111_p20170609.ebuild | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 95 insertions(+) |
