Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 595264 - sys-fs/ecryptfs-utils-111 version bump
Summary: sys-fs/ecryptfs-utils-111 version bump
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal with 1 vote (vote)
Assignee: Crypto team [DISABLED]
URL: https://launchpad.net/ecryptfs/trunk/111
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: CVE-2016-1572 697700
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2016-09-27 10:48 UTC by Machredsch
Modified: 2019-10-14 15:08 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Machredsch 2016-09-27 10:48:23 UTC 
111 released on 2016-05-02

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Matthias Maier gentoo-dev 2016-12-23 20:43:26 UTC 
Simply renaming the ebuild does the trick. Please bump :-)
Comment 2 Nikita Zlobin 2018-08-01 13:28:59 UTC 
+1
Version 108 fails to build, while 111 is ok (bug 662576).
Comment 3 Nikita Zlobin 2018-08-01 13:31:41 UTC 
Should not bug 572500 be marked here by "fixes" words instead of "blocks"?
At lesat that bug depends on this (572500).
Comment 4 Kristian Fiskerstrand (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2018-08-01 19:11:05 UTC 
(In reply to Nikita Zlobin from comment #3)
> Should not bug 572500 be marked here by "fixes" words instead of "blocks"?
> At lesat that bug depends on this (572500).

I don't understand what you're trying to say here; bug A blocks B means B depends on A , i.e A can not be resolved before B is resolved.
Comment 5 Kristian Fiskerstrand (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2018-08-01 19:14:29 UTC 
(In reply to Kristian Fiskerstrand from comment #4)
> (In reply to Nikita Zlobin from comment #3)
> > Should not bug 572500 be marked here by "fixes" words instead of "blocks"?
> > At lesat that bug depends on this (572500).
> 
> I don't understand what you're trying to say here; bug A blocks B means B
> depends on A , i.e A can not be resolved before B is resolved.

meh, meaning B can not be resolved before A is solved... confused myself there :)
Comment 6 Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev 2019-03-02 18:06:13 UTC 
Machredsch, it appears it would make more sense to attach your ebuild diff to this bug as crypto team probably does not look at github.
Comment 7 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2019-10-14 15:08:07 UTC 
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=c8d52e5c7308ae8eb0b87cc373289b0385d896a9

commit c8d52e5c7308ae8eb0b87cc373289b0385d896a9
Author:     Ben Kohler <bkohler@gentoo.org>
AuthorDate: 2019-10-14 15:06:01 +0000
Commit:     Ben Kohler <bkohler@gentoo.org>
CommitDate: 2019-10-14 15:07:49 +0000

    sys-fs/ecryptfs-utils: bump to new snapshot
    
    Version bump bug has been open over 3 years with no known blocking
    problems.  I'm doing a non-maintainer bump to fix several outstanding
    issues.
    
    Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/572500
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/595264
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/697700
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/694104
    Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12464
    Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.76, Repoman-2.3.17
    Signed-off-by: Ben Kohler <bkohler@gentoo.org>

 sys-fs/ecryptfs-utils/Manifest                     |  1 +
 .../ecryptfs-utils-111_p20170609.ebuild            | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 95 insertions(+)