Summary: | Please provide mapping for herd net-ftp@g.o (GLEP67) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Infrastructure | Reporter: | Michał Górny <mgorny> |
Component: | Other | Assignee: | Gentoo's FTP Packages Maintainers <net-ftp> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | kensington |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 569336 |
Description
Michał Górny
2015-12-23 15:08:18 UTC
If my grep skills do not fail me: /usr/portage/net-ftp/cmdftp/metadata.xml:<herd>net-ftp</herd> /usr/portage/net-ftp/filezilla/metadata.xml: <herd>net-ftp</herd> /usr/portage/net-ftp/proftpd/metadata.xml: <herd>net-ftp</herd> /usr/portage/net-ftp/pure-ftpd/metadata.xml:<herd>net-ftp</herd> /usr/portage/net-ftp/tlswrap/metadata.xml: <herd>net-ftp</herd> /usr/portage/net-ftp/vsftpd/metadata.xml: <herd>net-ftp</herd> I think it is not worth having a project to handle these (and most of these packages are better with a specific maintainer), so we should disband this herd. Lars, what do you think? (In reply to Bernard Cafarelli from comment #1) > If my grep skills do not fail me: > /usr/portage/net-ftp/cmdftp/metadata.xml:<herd>net-ftp</herd> > /usr/portage/net-ftp/filezilla/metadata.xml: <herd>net-ftp</herd> > /usr/portage/net-ftp/proftpd/metadata.xml: <herd>net-ftp</herd> > /usr/portage/net-ftp/pure-ftpd/metadata.xml:<herd>net-ftp</herd> > /usr/portage/net-ftp/tlswrap/metadata.xml: <herd>net-ftp</herd> > /usr/portage/net-ftp/vsftpd/metadata.xml: <herd>net-ftp</herd> > > I think it is not worth having a project to handle these (and most of these > packages are better with a specific maintainer), so we should disband this > herd. > Lars, what do you think? I agree. Personally I am interested in net-ftp/filezilla and net-ftp/pure-ftpd OK, let's go with option 3 then! Thanks, updated the mapping to reflect the decision to disband the herd. Just to be clear, which variant of disbanding do you prefer: 1. replacing it with both of you in all packages, 2. removing it with no direct replacement (you'd have to add yourselves before)? No direct replacement, most of these have specific maintainers (Lars, feel free to add yourself to filezilla metadata), the others will be better with maintainer-needed Ok, noted. Please add yourself to metadata in packages which you don't want to go into maintainer-needed since I will be announcing new maintainer-needed packages after the conversion. |