Bug 553926

Summary:	>=dev-libs/appstream-glib-0.4 , app-arch/gcab and >=dev-util/appdata-tools-0.1.8-r1 keyword request
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Pacho Ramos <pacho>
Component:	[OLD] Keywording and Stabilization	Assignee:	Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	normal	CC:	emeric.maschino, esigra
Priority:	Normal	Keywords:	KEYWORDREQ
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---
Bug Depends on:
Bug Blocks:	545082

Description Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2015-07-04 19:06:30 UTC

Thanks

Comment 1 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2015-07-04 19:07:14 UTC

*** Bug 523924 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2015-07-15 05:23:57 UTC

Marked ~hppa.

Comment 3 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2015-07-17 06:11:17 UTC

Marked ~ppc64.

Comment 4 Markus Meier gentoo-dev

2015-07-19 11:45:38 UTC

~arm added

Comment 5 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2015-09-06 08:05:59 UTC

ppc/sparc done

Comment 6 Michał Górny archtester

2015-09-07 18:35:52 UTC

The ppc/sparc keywording was incomplete, so I reverted it.

https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/43e66e7/5.html#l35

commit 597229d7e3c02ee506eaa6f577b26dc5a9cca187
Author: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Date:   Mon Sep 7 20:34:02 2015 +0200

    dev-libs/appstream-glib: Revert "ppc/sparc keyword, bug #553926"
    
    The >=dev-util/appdata-tools-0.1.8-r1 dependency is not keyworded.
    
    Reverts: 62efb9b66b7 (dev-libs/appstream-glib: ppc/sparc keyword, bug #553926)

Comment 7 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2015-09-07 19:09:00 UTC

redo ppc and sparc

Comment 8 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2015-09-08 18:28:26 UTC

Other option is to package.use.mask easytag[test]... but the reverse deps will grow along the time I guess :/

Comment 9 Tobias Klausmann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2015-09-20 14:46:14 UTC

Keyworded on alpha.

Comment 10 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2015-11-07 11:35:44 UTC

Emeric, could you please help us here and check if this could be keyworded on ia64? Thanks a lot

Comment 11 Émeric Maschino 2015-11-10 23:28:53 UTC

(In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #10)
> Emeric, could you please help us here and check if this could be keyworded
> on ia64? Thanks a lot

Sure.

Both =dev-libs/appstream-glib-{0.4.0:0/7|0.5.0:0/8} and app-arch/gcab emerged flawlessly. Latest =dev-util/appdata-tools-0.1.8-r1 was already keyworded ~ia64.

Beside successfully emerging them (also checked with FEATURES=test, though it doesn't seem any test is built nor executed), is there any functional test that you want me to try to ensure everything's fine?

     Émeric

Comment 12 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2015-11-11 07:32:00 UTC

I think trying to emerge one of the packages that DEPENDs on it will be enough :)

Comment 13 Émeric Maschino 2015-11-12 23:14:57 UTC

(In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #12)
> I think trying to emerge one of the packages that DEPENDs on it will be
> enough :)

The following packages (coming from =gnome-base/gnome-core-apps-3.16.0 dependencies and selected dependencies from =gnome-base/gnome-extra-apps-3.16.0) built fine with both =dev-libs/appstream-glib-0.4.0 and =dev-libs/appstream-glib-0.5.0:

=dev-util/appdata-tools-0.1.8-r1
=gnome-extra/gnome-color-manager-3.16.0
=gnome-extra/gnome-power-manager-3.16.1
=media-sound/sound-juicer-3.16.1
=media-video/cheese-3.16.1
=media-video/totem-3.16.4
=net-misc/vinagre-3.16.1

I thus think that ia64 can be keyworded safely ;-)

     Émeric

Comment 14 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2015-11-14 08:04:25 UTC

ia64 done

Thanks Emeric!