Bug 53075 – gnome-vfs-1.0.5-r3 does not compile with gcc-3.4.0-r6 due to mixed return types

• Product: Gentoo Linux
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Description Disenchanted (RETIRED) 2004-06-05 10:59:17 UTC]

two files use one typedef as return type in the header and another return type in implementation, this keeps gnome-vfs-1.0.5-r3 from being compiled with gcc-3.4.0-r6


Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. merge gcc-3.4.0-r6
2. merge gnome-vfs-1.0.5-r3 
3.

Actual Results:  
compile error

Expected Results:  
been compiled

i will attach the patch for the source and a patch for the ebuild so this is no
longer an issues

this is a problem with the source, so i will attach emerge -info on request only

[Comment 1 Disenchanted (RETIRED) 2004-06-05 11:04:18 UTC]

Created attachment 32728 [details, diff]
fixes source to merge with gcc-3.4.0

[Comment 2 Disenchanted (RETIRED) 2004-06-05 11:06:22 UTC]

Created attachment 32729 [details, diff]
patches ebuild to allow use of return types fix

[Comment 3 Robert Moss (RETIRED) 2004-07-07 19:45:01 UTC]

I can confirm this is an issue here too, with gcc-3.4.1. It would be nice to get this into portage ASAP, as this is yet another blocker preventing the marking of gcc-3.4.x as testing.

[Comment 4 Andrew Cowie 2004-07-10 21:50:51 UTC]

Have these been reported upstream to GNOME and/or GCC as appropriate? If so, what bug numbers?

[Comment 5 foser (RETIRED) 2004-07-12 06:20:19 UTC]

reported to gnome not that i am aware of. Not that it makes much of a difference i think -> gnome-vfs-1 isn't officially maintained anymore.

[Comment 6 foser (RETIRED) 2004-07-14 05:18:08 UTC]

*** Bug 56964 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 7 Travis Tilley (RETIRED) 2004-07-15 01:48:50 UTC]

foser - i take it you dont see anything overtly wrong with this patch?

[Comment 8 foser (RETIRED) 2004-07-19 05:22:36 UTC]

the patch looks fine to me.

[Comment 9 Disenchanted (RETIRED) 2004-09-17 15:14:18 UTC]

fixed in portage