Summary: | profiles: FreeBSD 9.0 or later version's test command supports GNU's == extension. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo/Alt | Reporter: | Yuta SATOH <nigoro.dev> |
Component: | FreeBSD | Assignee: | Gentoo/BSD Team <bsd+disabled> |
Status: | RESOLVED CANTFIX | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | FreeBSD | ||
URL: | http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=219084 | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=256305 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
sample patch for profiles/default/bsd/profile.bashrc
sample patch that changed the error message for profiles/default/bsd/profile.bashrc |
Description
Yuta SATOH
2014-02-12 11:47:19 UTC
Created attachment 370212 [details, diff]
sample patch for profiles/default/bsd/profile.bashrc
Sample patch to be removed
The configure script should be POSIX compatible even if FreeBSD silently support it. To catch such QA issue, I'm against removing it. Created attachment 370304 [details, diff] sample patch that changed the error message for profiles/default/bsd/profile.bashrc (In reply to Naohiro Aota from comment #2) > The configure script should be POSIX compatible even if FreeBSD silently > support it. To catch such QA issue, I'm against removing it. ok. What do you think to change the error message ? I think this line is not correct now... eerror "The configure checks of this package may not function properly" Well, this is bsd/profile.bashrc not bsd/fbsd/profile.bashrc Other (feature) Gentoo/BSDs still suffer with this problem. The comment is still true for other BSDs. (In reply to Naohiro Aota from comment #4) > Well, this is bsd/profile.bashrc not bsd/fbsd/profile.bashrc > Other (feature) Gentoo/BSDs still suffer with this problem. The comment is > still true for other BSDs. I'm sorry for the late reply. I agree with you. closing. |