Summary: | dev-tex/floatflt-1.31a stable request | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Pacho Ramos <pacho> |
Component: | [OLD] Keywording and Stabilization | Assignee: | TeX project <tex> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 477168 |
Description
Pacho Ramos
2013-09-14 14:22:02 UTC
its included in dev-texlive/texlive-latexextra so you should likely fix dibbler deps (In reply to Alexis Ballier from comment #1) > its included in dev-texlive/texlive-latexextra so you should likely fix > dibbler deps I don't understand what should I do (the package was moved to maintainer-needed a day ago and I am "new" with it, but we need newer version stable due gcc-4.7 :S) The current deps are the following: DEPEND="doc? ( dev-texlive/texlive-latex dev-tex/floatflt )" What is wrong with depending in floatflt? Thanks for the info (In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #2) > The current deps are the following: > DEPEND="doc? ( > dev-texlive/texlive-latex > dev-tex/floatflt replace this line with || ( tl-latexextra floatflt ) and you're done (and check if it works with tl-latexextra rather than floatflt of course but it should) + 14 Sep 2013; Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> dibbler-0.8.3-r1.ebuild: + Fix deps #484908 by Aballier + (In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #4) > + 14 Sep 2013; Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> dibbler-0.8.3-r1.ebuild: > + Fix deps #484908 by Aballier > + the idea is then to keep floatfl in testing and rely on latexextra for stable? (In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #5) > (In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #4) > > + 14 Sep 2013; Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> dibbler-0.8.3-r1.ebuild: > > + Fix deps #484908 by Aballier > > + > > the idea is then to keep floatfl in testing and rely on latexextra for > stable? yes since nobody is really maintaining floatflt I think Will close then ;) |