Summary: | KDE 4.9.2 fails to mount an exfat-formatted usb drive: "Requested filesystem type is neither well-known nor in /proc/filesystems nor in /etc/filesystems" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | PM <mitaspiotr> |
Component: | [OLD] KDE | Assignee: | Gentoo KDE team <kde> |
Status: | RESOLVED NEEDINFO | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | nikoli, ssuominen |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
PM
2012-11-04 18:41:14 UTC
Both UDisks1 and UDisks2 already have exfat listed internally as well known file system. sys-fs/udisks:0 says: src/device.c: "exfat", sys-fs/udisks:2 says: src/udiskslinuxfilesystem.c: "exfat", Does 'gvfs-mount' work from command-line? Requires sys-fs/gvfs built with USE="udev udisks -gdu fuse" for UDisks2 support and USE="udev -udisks gdu fuse" for UDisks1. I don't know what kind of FUSE layer KDE has in it's handling of them, but right now looking, this seems to be a bug in it, or lack of the layer entirely :P Does changing "exfat-fuse" to "exfat_fuse" in 99-exfat.rules change anything? Or possibly flipping the order of the ENV's? Does adding 'fuseblk' to /etc/filesystems help? Do a bit more digging before filing the bug, so I don't have to ask for these basics just to determine who gets the bug :P I found a solution: instead of "exfat" I added "exfat-fuse" to /etc/filesystems. I still consider this a bug, IMHO it should work out of the box without any workarounds. Please recompile your kdelibs in a way it uses sys-fs/udisks:2 instead of the dead sys-fs/udisks:0. We have bug 424157 for that. It's overdue anyway. (In reply to comment #3) > Please recompile your kdelibs in a way it uses sys-fs/udisks:2 instead of > the dead sys-fs/udisks:0. We have bug 424157 for that. It's overdue anyway. And use at least >=1.0.0 of fuse-exfat/exfat-utils. I think I had bad udev rules being installed. >And use at least >=1.0.0 of fuse-exfat/exfat-utils.
The tree only has 0.9.8.
(In reply to comment #5) > >And use at least >=1.0.0 of fuse-exfat/exfat-utils. > > The tree only has 0.9.8. It has 1.0.0 but the mirrors take a while to catch up. Try again in hour or two. Do you still have this problem? (In reply to comment #7) > Do you still have this problem? |