Summary: | app-backup/dar fails to build with gcc-4.7 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) <flameeyes> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Richard Freeman <rich0> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | joost |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | https://tinderboxlogs.s3.amazonaws.com/tbamd64.excelsior.flameeyes.eu/app-backup%3Adar-2.4.2%3A20120618-145658.html | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 390247 |
Description
Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED)
2012-06-18 15:00:10 UTC
Reproduced this on my system. Am checking this with upstream. Dar Version = 2.4.2 (Latest unstable in tree) (In reply to comment #2) > Dar Version = 2.4.2 (Latest unstable in tree) You might want to focus on 2.4.9 - that is in the tree now. However, there is a good chance that a patch for one will help the other. Dar 2.4.9 compiles correctly with GCC 4.7.1. (In reply to comment #4) > Dar 2.4.9 compiles correctly with GCC 4.7.1. Ok, then unless there is a trivial fix I think our solution is to aim to stabilize that in 30 days and this problem solves itself. We'll leave this open until the old versions are pruned (which might be a bit longer). My preference would be to get 2.4.9 stabilized. There was a big thread on the dar-support website about memory issues and really bad performance in certain conditions using 2.4.2. This is fixed then. Stabilization should be a new bug. (In reply to comment #7) > This is fixed then. Stabilization should be a new bug. Agreed. I've got it on my calendar... |