Bug 410527 – games-board/scid-vs-pc-4.7 - A free chess database application

• Product: Gentoo Linux
• Status: UNCONFIRMED ---

[Description Godfath3r 2012-04-02 10:11:31 UTC]

Created attachment 307465 [details]
scid-vs-pc.4.7.ebuild

It works for me, maybe it needs some further testing...

scid-vs-pc is a fork of scid chess db. See this suggestion https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410303

[Comment 1 Godfath3r 2012-04-02 10:12:41 UTC]

Created attachment 307467 [details, diff]
files/scid-vs-pc-4.7-gentoo.patch

[Comment 2 Godfath3r 2012-04-02 10:13:28 UTC]

Created attachment 307469 [details, diff]
files/scid-vs-pc-4.7-qa-warnings.patch

[Comment 3 Godfath3r 2012-04-02 10:19:39 UTC]

Also a !games-board/scid-vs-pc line should be added to scid-4.2.2 ebuild

[Comment 4 nihil39 2012-04-02 18:39:30 UTC]

First thing of all: thanks.
I'm a gentoo newbie and maybe my question is trivial but why don't you include this ebuild in the portage main tree? Even as a masked package I mean.

[Comment 5 Godfath3r 2012-04-02 23:46:33 UTC]

(In reply to comment #4)
> First thing of all: thanks.
> I'm a gentoo newbie and maybe my question is trivial but why don't you
> include this ebuild in the portage main tree? Even as a masked package I
> mean.

normal users/bug reporters can't do that. A developer has to test it/check it and then merge it to portage tree. (of course masked)

[Comment 6 nihil39 2012-05-12 10:28:17 UTC]

And how can we persuade a developer to do that? Tim Harder (who appears to be a developer...) in this ( https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410303 ) post suggests to merge scidvspc in the main tree. 
Can he at least verify the correct compilation of your ebuild and merge it (tesitng or masked or whatever)? Should I write him directly?