Summary: | media-gfx/gimp-2.6.11-r{5,6} - ld: gimp-thumbnail-list.o: undefined reference to symbol 'g_type_init' | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Anthoine Bourgeois <anthoine.bourgeois> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Hanno Böck <hanno> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | sping |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | 410403 | ||
Bug Blocks: | |||
Attachments: |
build.log
A fix to the now DSO behavior |
Description
Anthoine Bourgeois
2012-03-21 21:08:03 UTC
Created attachment 306241 [details]
build.log
So far I fail to reproduce this error. Please try with different versions of dev-libs/glib and media-gfx/gimp and report back. I try to emerge different gimp ebuild or glib without success. I emerge gimp some times ago and it works but now when I run revdep-rebuild gimp failed then I suspect a change in my chaintool. I change libtool (who is run by gnome2_src_prepare) to 2.4.2 or 2.2.10 version without success. I don't understand why is said "try adding it to the linker command line" then "could not read symbols: Invalid operation". The lib has the -rwxr-xr-x permission. Any Ideas ? I guess a tiny patch for Gimp is needed. This might be related to your problem: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UnderstandingDSOLinkChange Created attachment 307227 [details]
A fix to the now DSO behavior
(In reply to comment #4) > I guess a tiny patch for Gimp is needed. In attachment. > This might be related to your problem: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UnderstandingDSOLinkChange Exactly my problem. It seems that the patch does not apply to 2.6.11-r_6_ any more and that there is a patch in 2.6.11-r_6_ that does related changes (adding -lm). Could you try if 2.6.11-r_6_ or 2.6.12 compiles for you? If so, all we need to do is get a newer revision of the ebuild stabilized. Yes, 2.6.12 build well for me but not 2.6.11-r6. (In reply to comment #7) > [..] If so, all we need to do is get a newer revision > of the ebuild stabilized. (In reply to comment #8) > Yes, 2.6.12 build well for me but not 2.6.11-r6. 2.6.12 has been marked stable by now, closing. |