| Summary: | net-libs/gnutls should leave the libraries from old version | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Maciej Piechotka <uzytkownik2> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Crypto team [DISABLED] <crypto+disabled> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
|
Description
Maciej Piechotka
2012-01-29 16:22:32 UTC
This issue has been fixed in portage-2.2*. Portage itself will keep needed libraries on the system until the revdeps have been rebuilt.As such, I don't think it's something we should be rehashing in a different way on a per package basis. (In reply to comment #1) > This issue has been fixed in portage-2.2*. Portage itself will keep needed > libraries on the system until the revdeps have been rebuilt.As such, I don't > think it's something we should be rehashing in a different way on a per package > basis. Please note that portage is not the only package manager in Gentoo. Paludis don't do this and I don't know about pkgcore. (In reply to comment #1) > This issue has been fixed in portage-2.2*. Portage itself will keep needed > libraries on the system until the revdeps have been rebuilt.As such, I don't > think it's something we should be rehashing in a different way on a per package > basis. I asked on the forum[1] and from what I understand >=portage-2.2 is masked and will not be unmasked soon. Furthermore it seems that PMS is not mandating that behaviour and therefore it may be broken with 3-rd party PM. [1] http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-911138-start-0-postdays-0-postorder-asc-highlight-.html Portage 2.1 got preserved-rebuild. |
