Bug 364229 – app-text/libwpd-0.8* and libwpg-0.1* removal request (was: libwpd-0.8.14 fails to build with gcc-4.6)

• Product: Gentoo Linux
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Description Philipp 2011-04-20 11:48:54 UTC]

Created attachment 270643 [details]
Patch to fix the build

In file included from WPXPageSpan.h:31:0,
                 from WPXListener.h:30,
                 from WP6Listener.cpp:29:
WPXTable.h:79:24: error: declaration of 'operator[]' as non-function
WPXTable.h:79:22: error: expected ';' at end of member declaration
WPXTable.h:79:31: error: expected ')' before 'i'

[Comment 1 Pacho Ramos 2011-04-20 12:20:21 UTC]

Fixed in 0.9.1

[Comment 2 Pacho Ramos 2011-04-21 11:52:43 UTC]

*** Bug 364283 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 3 Philipp 2011-04-26 11:57:17 UTC]

This is not fixed for libwpd-0.9.1.
Somehow the ebuild doesn't apply the patch anymore.
Has the "epatch" been removed by accident?

[Comment 4 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) 2011-04-26 12:17:48 UTC]

whoops, it seems I did this. I'll fix it asap.

[Comment 5 Pacho Ramos 2011-04-26 18:51:43 UTC]

I committed the fix again a few minutes ago

[Comment 6 Pacho Ramos 2011-07-02 11:21:38 UTC]

*** Bug 373759 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 7 Pacho Ramos 2011-07-10 09:41:11 UTC]

*** Bug 374653 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 8 fkhp 2011-07-14 22:56:34 UTC]

(In reply to comment #7)
> *** Bug 374653 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

this bug of libwpd-0.8.14-r1 should be fixed presently as openoffice depends on libwpd-0.8.14-r1.

[Comment 9 Pacho Ramos 2011-07-15 16:49:27 UTC]

openoffice is dead and won't be fixed to compile with gcc-4.6 itself, on the other hand, libreoffice already builds with gcc-4.6 and uses a system one libwpd that also compiles with gcc-4.6 (while openoffice was using an internal copy)

[Comment 10 Pacho Ramos 2011-08-05 11:56:16 UTC]

*** Bug 377851 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 11 Pacho Ramos 2011-12-05 11:04:40 UTC]

*** Bug 393105 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 12 Pacho Ramos 2011-12-05 11:05:09 UTC]

Will try to drop 0.8 slot soon

[Comment 13 Tolga Dalman 2012-03-16 09:48:34 UTC]

I suppose, libwpd-0.8 can go now as I can see no dependencies on that package, right ?

[Comment 14 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2012-03-17 05:47:02 UTC]

(In reply to comment #13)
> I suppose, libwpd-0.8 can go now as I can see no dependencies on that
> package, right ?

then you are doing it wrong, as there are multiple consumers for the old slot left in tree.    abiword, libwpg, etc

[Comment 15 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2012-03-17 05:52:27 UTC]

punted old abiword, libwpg, and libwpd, closing