Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 364229 - app-text/libwpd-0.8* and libwpg-0.1* removal request (was: libwpd-0.8.14 fails to build with gcc-4.6)
Summary: app-text/libwpd-0.8* and libwpg-0.1* removal request (was: libwpd-0.8.14 fail...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] GCC Porting (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 364283 373759 374653 377851 393105 (view as bug list)
Depends on: 393245 393247 393249 394897 401461 401463 405869
Blocks: gcc-4.6
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2011-04-20 11:48 UTC by Philipp
Modified: 2012-03-17 05:52 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Patch to fix the build (libwpd-0.8.14-gcc46.patch,272 bytes, text/plain)
2011-04-20 11:48 UTC, Philipp
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Philipp 2011-04-20 11:48:54 UTC
Created attachment 270643 [details]
Patch to fix the build

In file included from WPXPageSpan.h:31:0,
                 from WPXListener.h:30,
                 from WP6Listener.cpp:29:
WPXTable.h:79:24: error: declaration of 'operator[]' as non-function
WPXTable.h:79:22: error: expected ';' at end of member declaration
WPXTable.h:79:31: error: expected ')' before 'i'
Comment 1 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2011-04-20 12:20:21 UTC
Fixed in 0.9.1
Comment 2 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2011-04-21 11:52:43 UTC
*** Bug 364283 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Philipp 2011-04-26 11:57:17 UTC
This is not fixed for libwpd-0.9.1.
Somehow the ebuild doesn't apply the patch anymore.
Has the "epatch" been removed by accident?
Comment 4 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-04-26 12:17:48 UTC
whoops, it seems I did this. I'll fix it asap.
Comment 5 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2011-04-26 18:51:43 UTC
I committed the fix again a few minutes ago
Comment 6 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2011-07-02 11:21:38 UTC
*** Bug 373759 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2011-07-10 09:41:11 UTC
*** Bug 374653 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 fkhp 2011-07-14 22:56:34 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> *** Bug 374653 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

this bug of libwpd-0.8.14-r1 should be fixed presently as openoffice depends on libwpd-0.8.14-r1.
Comment 9 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2011-07-15 16:49:27 UTC
openoffice is dead and won't be fixed to compile with gcc-4.6 itself, on the other hand, libreoffice already builds with gcc-4.6 and uses a system one libwpd that also compiles with gcc-4.6 (while openoffice was using an internal copy)
Comment 10 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2011-08-05 11:56:16 UTC
*** Bug 377851 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2011-12-05 11:04:40 UTC
*** Bug 393105 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2011-12-05 11:05:09 UTC
Will try to drop 0.8 slot soon
Comment 13 Tolga Dalman 2012-03-16 09:48:34 UTC
I suppose, libwpd-0.8 can go now as I can see no dependencies on that package, right ?
Comment 14 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-03-17 05:47:02 UTC
(In reply to comment #13)
> I suppose, libwpd-0.8 can go now as I can see no dependencies on that
> package, right ?

then you are doing it wrong, as there are multiple consumers for the old slot left in tree.    abiword, libwpg, etc
Comment 15 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-03-17 05:52:27 UTC
punted old abiword, libwpg, and libwpd, closing