| Summary: | app-portage/gentoolkit-0.3.0_rc11-r2: euse does not support new portage config file locations | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Portage Development | Reporter: | Ben Sagal <bensagal> |
| Component: | Tools | Assignee: | Portage Tools Team <tools-portage> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | InVCS |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | 2.1 | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 237964 | ||
| Attachments: |
0.3.0_rc11-euse.patch
euse |
||
|
Description
Ben Sagal
2010-11-23 12:18:57 UTC
Created attachment 255205 [details, diff]
0.3.0_rc11-euse.patch
Patch for euse in 0.3.0_rc11.
Thanks for the patch, howerver it does not take into account the situation where there are both /etc/portage/make.conf and /etc/make.conf files. In the is case both are should be read with /etc/portage/make.conf overriding /etc/make.conf also /etc/make.globals has been moved to /usr/share/portage/config/make.globals I was afraid of that. We also have the same issue with /etc/make.profile and /etc/portage/make.profile I've reverted my changes in subversion since the is going to be a more complex change. Created attachment 255261 [details]
euse
Try this version of euse.
zmedico: would you mind looking at the euse that I attached to the bug and make sure I got it right for which files to use? It's all pretty much at the start of the script fuzzyray: that looks good $ svn commit -m "Update euse to look for portage config files in new as well as old paths. Bug 346519" Sending gentoolkit/ChangeLog Sending gentoolkit/bin/euse Transmitting file data .. Committed revision 868. I will revision bump the ebuild to -r3 to contain the fixed version of euse. My IRC snippet didn't paste well. I asked zmedico to comment and he responded that it looked okay. Anyhow, this is released in gentoolkit-0.3.0_rc11-r3 |
