portage-2.1.9 and portage-2.2 support the use of /etc/portage/make.conf in addition to /etc/make.conf. /etc/portage/make.conf is ignored by euse, and on systems only using this file euse will not start.
Created attachment 255205 [details, diff] 0.3.0_rc11-euse.patch Patch for euse in 0.3.0_rc11.
Thanks for the patch, howerver it does not take into account the situation where there are both /etc/portage/make.conf and /etc/make.conf files. In the is case both are should be read with /etc/portage/make.conf overriding /etc/make.conf also /etc/make.globals has been moved to /usr/share/portage/config/make.globals
I was afraid of that. We also have the same issue with /etc/make.profile and /etc/portage/make.profile I've reverted my changes in subversion since the is going to be a more complex change.
Created attachment 255261 [details] euse Try this version of euse.
zmedico: would you mind looking at the euse that I attached to the bug and make sure I got it right for which files to use? It's all pretty much at the start of the script fuzzyray: that looks good $ svn commit -m "Update euse to look for portage config files in new as well as old paths. Bug 346519" Sending gentoolkit/ChangeLog Sending gentoolkit/bin/euse Transmitting file data .. Committed revision 868. I will revision bump the ebuild to -r3 to contain the fixed version of euse.
My IRC snippet didn't paste well. I asked zmedico to comment and he responded that it looked okay. Anyhow, this is released in gentoolkit-0.3.0_rc11-r3
