Bug 340387

Summary:	sys-apps/file-5.04 use EAPI-1 atom for has_version in EAPI-0 ebuild (through python eclass)
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Sebastian Luther (few) <SebastianLuther>
Component:	New packages	Assignee:	Gentoo's Team for Core System packages <base-system>
Status:	RESOLVED LATER
Severity:	normal	CC:	cyprien, dennis, enviouzproductionz07, gentoo, jer, jlec, lpmichalik, mlowe1999, r_meier
Priority:	High
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---
Bug Depends on:
Bug Blocks:	340395
Attachments:	build.log

Description Sebastian Luther (few) 2010-10-10 18:59:50 UTC

Under some circumstances, the python eclass calls has_version with an EAPI-1 slot atom. The python team has been informed about that and remaining ebuilds will be fixed or get bugs reported.

Current portage version aborts on that. See build.log.

Comment 1 Sebastian Luther (few) 2010-10-10 19:00:26 UTC

Created attachment 250141 [details]
build.log

Comment 2 Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-10-11 08:31:38 UTC

*** Bug 340485 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Cyprien Nicolas (fulax) 2010-10-11 09:02:12 UTC

I just hit that bug too.

Resolved Later ? I'm sorry I have to disagree with the resolution

sys-apps/file python _fails_ to merge, sys-apps/file-5.04 just went _stable_

So this cannot be 'resolved'. it will be resolved if either the 'python' use for that package gets masked, or if the ebuild is fixed.

And Later is a little vague, can you give a little more precise please?

Comment 4 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-10-11 13:06:38 UTC

*** Bug 340523 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Sebastian Luther (few) 2010-10-11 16:50:23 UTC

*** Bug 340551 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Zac Medico gentoo-dev

2010-10-11 19:56:29 UTC

In the next portage release it will eqawarn instead of die:

http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=5de77e44aa10ed5ff8262c184df651c2adc868bd

Comment 7 SpanKY gentoo-dev

2010-10-11 20:39:01 UTC

thanks.  portage need not be concerned with this bug ... if you want to follow one, it'd be the tracker bug.

as for file going stable, that is wholly irrelevant.  you're using a masked portage.  dont try to bs issues into a scale they arent.

Comment 8 SpanKY gentoo-dev

2010-10-12 05:57:33 UTC

*** Bug 340609 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 9 Zac Medico gentoo-dev

2010-10-12 06:49:51 UTC

*** Bug 340629 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***