Summary: | sys-devel/gcc-4.4.3 - prevent linking ppl/cloog/c++ into everything | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Ryan Hill (RETIRED) <rhill> |
Component: | [OLD] Core system | Assignee: | Gentoo Toolchain Maintainers <toolchain> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | realnc |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | gcc44-cloog-dl.patch |
Description
Ryan Hill (RETIRED)
2010-04-24 21:26:18 UTC
Created attachment 229033 [details, diff]
gcc44-cloog-dl.patch
gcc-4.4.3-r1 is in the tree with the patchset bumped to include this. Thanks. I also found one for 4.5.0 which I will include as well (soon after verifying this one) looks like you added the debian version which dlopens libcloog-ppl.so.0 (they renamed the libraries). we need the fedora version that uses libcloog.so.0. :/ Damn. Thanks for catching that. I just ripped that revbump out of CVS and added a new one with the proper patch. (In reply to comment #4) > Damn. Thanks for catching that. I just ripped that revbump out of CVS and > added a new one with the proper patch. This would need another revbump. Making a mistake is no reason not to revbump :/ (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Damn. Thanks for catching that. I just ripped that revbump out of CVS and > > added a new one with the proper patch. > > This would need another revbump. Making a mistake is no reason not to revbump > :/ > You misread what I said. I said I ripped the revision I made out of the tree and added a new one... |