Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 317059 - sys-devel/gcc-4.4.3 - prevent linking ppl/cloog/c++ into everything
Summary: sys-devel/gcc-4.4.3 - prevent linking ppl/cloog/c++ into everything
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Core system (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Toolchain Maintainers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-04-24 21:26 UTC by Ryan Hill (RETIRED)
Modified: 2010-04-25 22:01 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
gcc44-cloog-dl.patch (gcc44-cloog-dl.patch,5.99 KB, patch)
2010-04-24 21:28 UTC, Ryan Hill (RETIRED)
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ryan Hill (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-04-24 21:26:18 UTC
reminder bug for Mark.

https://bugs.gentoo.org/315377#c4
Comment 1 Ryan Hill (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-04-24 21:28:03 UTC
Created attachment 229033 [details, diff]
gcc44-cloog-dl.patch
Comment 2 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-04-25 19:41:51 UTC
gcc-4.4.3-r1 is in the tree with the patchset bumped to include this.  Thanks.  I also found one for 4.5.0 which I will include as well (soon after verifying this one)
Comment 3 Ryan Hill (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-04-25 21:20:26 UTC
looks like you added the debian version which dlopens libcloog-ppl.so.0 (they renamed the libraries).  we need the fedora version that uses libcloog.so.0. :/
Comment 4 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-04-25 21:35:30 UTC
Damn.  Thanks for catching that.  I just ripped that revbump out of CVS and added a new one with the proper patch.
Comment 5 Nikos Chantziaras 2010-04-25 21:46:17 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> Damn.  Thanks for catching that.  I just ripped that revbump out of CVS and
> added a new one with the proper patch.

This would need another revbump.  Making a mistake is no reason not to revbump :/
Comment 6 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-04-25 22:01:35 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Damn.  Thanks for catching that.  I just ripped that revbump out of CVS and
> > added a new one with the proper patch.
> 
> This would need another revbump.  Making a mistake is no reason not to revbump
> :/
> 

You misread what I said.  I said I ripped the revision I made out of the tree and added a new one...