| Summary: | x11-libs/libdrm builds programs only used in src_test in src_compile | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Jonathan Callen (RETIRED) <jcallen> |
| Component: | [OLD] Unspecified | Assignee: | Gentoo X packagers <x11> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | daiderek |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25997 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: | patch to only build tests in make check | ||
|
Description
Jonathan Callen (RETIRED)
2010-01-12 00:19:17 UTC
Created attachment 216146 [details, diff]
patch to only build tests in make check
libdrm does need a little work wrt to tests. Let's track all those issues in the duped bug. Thanks *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 299008 *** this one isn't really a dupe ... this is about some of the various tests unconditional, not deps that get detected at configure time *** Bug 412907 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Since Jonathan's patch was accepted into the 2.4.21 release, I was pretty confused why this bug was reopened. Upon further investigation, libdrm still builds modeprint, modetest, vbltest, proptest, intel/test_decode, and probably some other binaries that aren't installed. Given that patching things to avoid building them probably means an autoreconf, I doubt it's worth it. (In reply to Matt Turner from comment #5) > Given that patching things to avoid building them probably means an > autoreconf, I doubt it's worth it. |