Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 290364

Summary: =xfce-base/xfce4-session-4.6.1-r1 fortune -change must be converted to upstream patch format.
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) <ssuominen>
Component: Current packagesAssignee: XFCE Team <xfce>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: QA CC: sping
Priority: High    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6525
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---
Attachments: Add --{en,dis}able-tips configure options

Description Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-10-24 12:08:12 UTC
This is wrong because it will still build xfce4-tips binary at compile-time,

if ! use fortune; then
 # Wipe away unusable xfce4-tips
 rm -Rf "${D}"/usr/share/xfce4/tips
 rm -f "${D}"/usr/bin/xfce4-tips \
   "${D}"/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/xfce4-tips.debug \
   "${D}"/etc/xdg/autostart/xfce4-tips-autostart.desktop
 rmdir -p "${D}"/etc/xdg/autostart
fi

It must be converted to upstream suitable patch for "./configure --disable-tips" flag to work.
Comment 1 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-10-24 12:09:29 UTC
And we also have policy to report everything upstream, http://bugzilla.xfce.org/ or otherwise the change will be dropped in next revision. This is no exception.
Comment 2 Sebastian Pipping gentoo-dev 2009-10-24 15:45:50 UTC
Created attachment 208145 [details, diff]
Add --{en,dis}able-tips configure options

First candidate on a patch.
Comment 3 Christoph Mende (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-12-15 18:18:30 UTC
Did you take this patch upstream already, Sebastian?
Comment 4 Sebastian Pipping gentoo-dev 2009-12-20 17:49:04 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Did you take this patch upstream already, Sebastian?

No, I assumed Samuli would do that.  Feel free to take it upstream.
Comment 5 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2010-01-17 22:16:19 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Did you take this patch upstream already, Sebastian?
> 
> No, I assumed Samuli would do that.  Feel free to take it upstream.
> 

Sebastian, please don't patch anything else in gentoo for xfce if you are not willing to take it upstream. Thanks in advance.
Comment 6 Sebastian Pipping gentoo-dev 2010-01-17 23:21:04 UTC
Jeremy, I wrote the patch to take work off you guys shoulders.  To me the original solution was perfectly adequate.  I'm busy with more important stuff, Gentoo things included.  I'm not shy of co-op with upstream at all.
Comment 7 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2010-01-17 23:35:59 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> Jeremy, I wrote the patch to take work off you guys shoulders.  To me the
> original solution was perfectly adequate.  I'm busy with more important stuff,
> Gentoo things included.  I'm not shy of co-op with upstream at all.
> 

I realized that you are too busy with more important things. As such, I just asked you to not mess with xfce in the future. Thanks.
Comment 8 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-06-26 21:23:34 UTC
http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6525