Summary: | sys-libs/libcap-ng keyword request | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Alin Năstac (RETIRED) <mrness> |
Component: | [OLD] Library | Assignee: | Gentoo's Team for Core System packages <base-system> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | pacho |
Priority: | High | Keywords: | KEYWORDREQ |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | 292133 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 303527 |
Description
Alin Năstac (RETIRED)
![]() ~x86 added Tests are failing (bug 292133). If you have another way to test the library, shoot because only app-emulation/libvirt is using it in the tree and it's a toolkit not keyworded for ppc... keyworded ~arch for ppc ~sparc done ppc: you're missing 0.6.2 (In reply to comment #4) > ~sparc done > > ppc: you're missing 0.6.2 > 0.6.2 is also needed by the just bumped bluez-4.60 Marked ~ppc. (In reply to comment #5) > 0.6.2 is also needed by the just bumped bluez-4.60 Please file a separate bug report for that rekeywording request. Ups, sorry, I thought that I could re-use this since some arches were still pending and I misinterpreted that this request was "bumped" to 0.6.2 due comment #4 Do I need to open a new bug report for *this case* or I don't need it for this (as I already added arches some time ago) ? Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience (In reply to comment #7) > Ups, sorry, I thought that I could re-use this since some arches were still > pending and I misinterpreted that this request was "bumped" to 0.6.2 due > comment #4 The version bump was done before ranger keyworded for PPC, so he should have keyworded both when he found out instead of only what he had tested... I've opened a keywording request that this bug now blocks. Marked ~hppa. Thanks a lot Jeroen, I will do it better next time ~arm added ~ppc64 |